From: Dave.Martin@arm.com (Dave Martin)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] ARM: force linker to use PIC veneers
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2015 10:46:14 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150325104603.GA3560@e103592.cambridge.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKv+Gu9NeqOTjUux9S7p5o89T1tc9ACraC0D53Y=CCTNzZXKMg@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 06:35:56PM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> On 24 March 2015 at 14:54, Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 01:50:40PM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
[...]
> >> > On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 11:16:24AM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> >> >> When building a very large kernel, it is up to the linker to decide
> >> >> when and where to insert stubs to allow calls to functions that are
> >> >> out of range for the ordinary b/bl instructions.
> >> >>
> >> >> However, since the kernel is built as a position dependent binary,
> >> >> these stubs (aka veneers) may contain absolute addresses, which will
> >> >> break such veneer assisted far calls performed with the MMU off.
> >> >>
> >> >> For instance, the call from __enable_mmu() in the .head.text section
> >> >> to __turn_mmu_on() in the .idmap.text section may be turned into
> >> >> something like this:
> >> >>
> >> >> c0008168 <__enable_mmu>:
> >> >> c0008168: f020 0002 bic.w r0, r0, #2
> >> >> c000816c: f420 5080 bic.w r0, r0, #4096
> >> >> c0008170: f000 b846 b.w c0008200 <____turn_mmu_on_veneer>
> >> >> [...]
> >> >> c0008200 <____turn_mmu_on_veneer>:
> >> >> c0008200: 4778 bx pc
> >> >> c0008202: 46c0 nop
> >> >> c0008204: e59fc000 ldr ip, [pc]
> >> >> c0008208: e12fff1c bx ip
> >> >> c000820c: c13dfae1 teqgt sp, r1, ror #21
> >> >> [...]
> >> >> c13dfae0 <__turn_mmu_on>:
> >> >> c13dfae0: 4600 mov r0, r0
> >> >> [...]
> >> >>
> >> >> After adding --pic-veneer to the LDFLAGS, the veneer is emitted like
> >> >> this instead:
> >> >>
> >> >> c0008200 <____turn_mmu_on_veneer>:
> >> >> c0008200: 4778 bx pc
> >> >> c0008202: 46c0 nop
> >> >> c0008204: e59fc004 ldr ip, [pc, #4]
> >> >> c0008208: e08fc00c add ip, pc, ip
> >> >> c000820c: e12fff1c bx ip
> >> >> c0008210: 013d7d31 teqeq sp, r1, lsr sp
> >> >> c0008214: 00000000 andeq r0, r0, r0
> >> >>
> >> >> Note that this particular example is best addressed by moving
> >> >> .head.text and .idmap.text closer together, but this issue could
> >> >> potentially affect any code that needs to execute with the
> >> >> MMU off.
> >> >>
> >> >> Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
[...]
> >> The primary concern is that you can't really check whether any
> >> problematic veneers have been emitted, unless all code that may run
> >> with the MMU off is moved to the idmap.text section.
> >
> > That's a valid argument.
> >
> > Come to think of it, I can't think of a good reason why we don't
> > pass --use-blx to the linker for THUMB2_KERNEL. I think that would
> > at least make these sequences a bit less painful by getting rid of
> > the "bx pc" stuff.
> >
>
> Well, passing --use-blx doesn't seem to have the desired effect. I
> still get these
>
> c0181ba8 <___raw_spin_lock_veneer>:
> c0181ba8: 4778 bx pc
> c0181baa: 46c0 nop ; (mov r8, r8)
> [...]
Hmmm, you seem to be right.
Thumb has no bx <label> instruction, and veneers introduced by ld are
always ARM code, so this looks tricky to avoid without patching ld.
As you observe, this only impacts large kernels anyway.
So,
Reviewed-by: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>
Cheers
---Dave
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-03-25 10:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-03-24 10:16 [PATCH] ARM: force linker to use PIC veneers Ard Biesheuvel
2015-03-24 12:22 ` Dave Martin
2015-03-24 12:50 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2015-03-24 13:54 ` Dave Martin
2015-03-24 14:04 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2015-03-24 15:23 ` Nicolas Pitre
2015-03-24 17:35 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2015-03-25 10:46 ` Dave Martin [this message]
2015-03-26 11:36 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-03-26 12:20 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2015-03-26 12:22 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-03-26 12:24 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2015-03-26 12:53 ` Dave P Martin
2015-03-26 13:05 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2015-03-26 13:19 ` Dave P Martin
2015-03-27 0:01 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2015-03-30 12:06 ` Dave P Martin
2015-03-24 15:16 ` Nicolas Pitre
2015-03-24 15:23 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2015-03-24 15:49 ` Nicolas Pitre
2015-03-24 15:51 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2015-03-24 23:25 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-03-24 23:30 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2015-03-24 15:41 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2015-03-24 16:42 ` Nicolas Pitre
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150325104603.GA3560@e103592.cambridge.arm.com \
--to=dave.martin@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox