From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com (Boris Brezillon) Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2015 13:25:43 +0100 Subject: at91 clocks In-Reply-To: <20150327132003.6caf3689@bbrezillon> References: <55117568.6090202@microbit.se> <20150325013201.3f01fc22@bbrezillon> <55127AA6.5050902@microbit.se> <20150325173751.0d6479df@bbrezillon> <5513D701.2080201@microbit.se> <20150326162827.041c051a@bbrezillon> <55152F3E.60004@microbit.se> <20150327132003.6caf3689@bbrezillon> Message-ID: <20150327132543.08ad636c@bbrezillon> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Fri, 27 Mar 2015 13:20:03 +0100 Boris Brezillon wrote: > > > > I tested with IS_ERR, changed this to IS_ERR_OR_NULL, but the pointer is ok. > > Can you print clk_get_rate(parent_clk) result ? Could you also paste me the whole clk_summary content ? -- Boris Brezillon, Free Electrons Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering http://free-electrons.com