From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: mingo@kernel.org (Ingo Molnar) Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2015 09:14:52 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 01/11] clocksource: arm_arch_timer: Rename arch_timer_probed to reflect behaviour In-Reply-To: <1427746633-9137-1-git-send-email-daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> References: <5519AEB2.8050306@linaro.org> <1427746633-9137-1-git-send-email-daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Message-ID: <20150331071452.GA9252@gmail.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org * Daniel Lezcano wrote: > From: Laurent Pinchart > > The arch_timer_probed function returns whether the given time doesn't > need to be probed. This can be the case when the timer has been probed > already, but also when it has no corresponding enabled node in DT. > > Rename the function to arch_timer_need_probe and invert its return value > to better reflect the function's purpose and behaviour. > > Acked-by: Sudeep Holla > Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart > Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano > --- > drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c | 13 +++++++------ > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c b/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c > index a3025e7..50bb7f2 100644 > --- a/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c > +++ b/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c > @@ -661,17 +661,17 @@ static const struct of_device_id arch_timer_mem_of_match[] __initconst = { > }; > > static bool __init > -arch_timer_probed(int type, const struct of_device_id *matches) > +arch_timer_need_probe(int type, const struct of_device_id *matches) If we do a rename we might as well use valid English spelling such as 'arch_timer_needs_probing()'? Thanks, Ingo