From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com (Alexandre Belloni) Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2015 10:20:52 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 1/2] drivers/rtc/rtc-s3c.c: Integrate Exynos3250 into S3C6410 In-Reply-To: References: <1427728773-29065-1-git-send-email-k.kozlowski@samsung.com> <1427728773-29065-2-git-send-email-k.kozlowski@samsung.com> <20150331002709.GF3849@piout.net> Message-ID: <20150331082052.GI3849@piout.net> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi, On 31/03/2015 at 08:49:39 +0200, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote : > Hello Alexandre, > > On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 2:27 AM, Alexandre Belloni > wrote: > > nitpick: I would prefer rtc: rtc-s3c instead of drivers/rtc/rtc-s3c.c > > > > Yes but Krzysztof is following the convention used in drivers/rtc/ > which I think is the correct thing to do even when it's different from > what is used all over the kernel. > Having a look at the git history, the first and most used prefix is actually 'rtc:' at some point, this started to change to 'drivers/rtc/'. We should probably start to get back to 'rtc:', like most subsystems. -- Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com