From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: jason@lakedaemon.net (Jason Cooper)
Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2015 14:29:22 +0000
Subject: [PATCH 4/5] irqchip: armada-370-xp: Allow using wakeup source
In-Reply-To: <551E3EA3.8010409@free-electrons.com>
References: <1427724278-12379-1-git-send-email-gregory.clement@free-electrons.com>
 <1427724278-12379-5-git-send-email-gregory.clement@free-electrons.com>
 <20150402232316.GJ24598@io.lakedaemon.net>
 <551E3EA3.8010409@free-electrons.com>
Message-ID: <20150403142922.GL24598@io.lakedaemon.net>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Fri, Apr 03, 2015 at 09:17:55AM +0200, Gregory CLEMENT wrote:
> Hi Jason,
> 
> On 03/04/2015 01:23, Jason Cooper wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 04:04:37PM +0200, Gregory CLEMENT wrote:
> >> On the Armada 370/XP SoCs, in standby mode the SoC stay powered and it
> >> is possible to wake-up from any interrupt sources. This patch adds
> >> flag to the MPIC irqchip driver to let linux know this.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@free-electrons.com>
> >> ---
> >>  drivers/irqchip/irq-armada-370-xp.c | 1 +
> >>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> > 
> > Applied to irqchip/mvebu
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> Do you agree to take also the patch 3?

hmmm...

> It modifies a file in mach-mvebu (board-v7.c) but it depends on a patch
> located in irqchip: "irqchip: gic: Add an entry point to set up irqchip flags"

Yeah, I saw that.  Do you forsee any merge conflicts with mvebu?  The reason I
ask is that it looks like I'm going to be sending directly to Linus this
cycle.  I'd really prefer to hold off a cycle on that patch.  I'm not
100% certain my second PR (stacked domain/DT break) is going to get
accepted.  Which is what this patch depends on.

thoughts?

thx,

Jason.