From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: olof@lixom.net (Olof Johansson) Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2015 13:22:01 -0700 Subject: [GIT PULL] wireless wl12xx and omap device tree changes for v4.1 In-Reply-To: <20150403201122.GW23023@localhost> References: <20150325214050.GA31346@atomide.com> <20150403201122.GW23023@localhost> Message-ID: <20150403202201.GX23023@localhost> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Fri, Apr 03, 2015 at 01:11:22PM -0700, Olof Johansson wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 02:40:51PM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote: > > The following changes since commit 06e5801b8cb3fc057d88cb4dc03c0b64b2744cda: > > > > Linux 4.0-rc4 (2015-03-15 17:38:20 -0700) > > > > are available in the git repository at: > > > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tmlind/linux-omap tags/omap-for-v4.1/wl12xx-dt > > > > for you to fetch changes up to 83c3a7d4ac7fdc29a64bf9a5467a36b4c72a1eed: > > > > wlcore: remove wl12xx_platform_data (2015-03-24 09:48:14 -0700) > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > > Wireless and omap changes to make wl12xx driver to use device tree > > data instead of platform data from Eliad Peller : > > > > - Add device-tree support to the wlcore (wl12xx/wl18xx) driver. > > > > - Update the current users to use the bindings instead of pdata-quirks. > > > > - Finally, remove the deprecated wl12xx_platform_data struct > > > > Note that da850 board file code that still uses the platform data, > > but we have da850.dtsi that can be used instead. So it was decided > > that we should try to remove the wl12xx support from the da850 > > board file as suggested by Sekhar Nori . As it's > > the last patch in the series, the last patch can be simply reverted > > if needed. > > > > As this series touches quite a bit of arch code, it was suggested > > by Kalle Valo that the whole series should > > be merged via the arm-soc tree. > > I'm happy to merge this, but -rc4 is newer than anything else we have. Can you > respin on -rc2? Unless there's a need for -rc4, of course. Nevermind, we've already got -rc4 elsewhere, so I'll just catch this branch up too. -Olof