From: tony@atomide.com (Tony Lindgren)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [GIT PULL] wireless wl12xx and omap device tree changes for v4.1
Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2015 15:12:30 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150403221230.GW10805@atomide.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150403202201.GX23023@localhost>
* Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> [150403 13:22]:
> On Fri, Apr 03, 2015 at 01:11:22PM -0700, Olof Johansson wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 02:40:51PM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > > The following changes since commit 06e5801b8cb3fc057d88cb4dc03c0b64b2744cda:
> > >
> > > Linux 4.0-rc4 (2015-03-15 17:38:20 -0700)
> > >
> > > are available in the git repository at:
> > >
> > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tmlind/linux-omap tags/omap-for-v4.1/wl12xx-dt
> > >
> > > for you to fetch changes up to 83c3a7d4ac7fdc29a64bf9a5467a36b4c72a1eed:
> > >
> > > wlcore: remove wl12xx_platform_data (2015-03-24 09:48:14 -0700)
> > >
> > > ----------------------------------------------------------------
> > > Wireless and omap changes to make wl12xx driver to use device tree
> > > data instead of platform data from Eliad Peller <eliad@wizery.com>:
> > >
> > > - Add device-tree support to the wlcore (wl12xx/wl18xx) driver.
> > >
> > > - Update the current users to use the bindings instead of pdata-quirks.
> > >
> > > - Finally, remove the deprecated wl12xx_platform_data struct
> > >
> > > Note that da850 board file code that still uses the platform data,
> > > but we have da850.dtsi that can be used instead. So it was decided
> > > that we should try to remove the wl12xx support from the da850
> > > board file as suggested by Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com>. As it's
> > > the last patch in the series, the last patch can be simply reverted
> > > if needed.
> > >
> > > As this series touches quite a bit of arch code, it was suggested
> > > by Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org> that the whole series should
> > > be merged via the arm-soc tree.
> >
> > I'm happy to merge this, but -rc4 is newer than anything else we have. Can you
> > respin on -rc2? Unless there's a need for -rc4, of course.
>
> Nevermind, we've already got -rc4 elsewhere, so I'll just catch this branch up
> too.
OK thanks that avoids basing on a non -rc tag and merge conflicts.
Regards,
Tony
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-04-03 22:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-03-25 21:40 [GIT PULL] wireless wl12xx and omap device tree changes for v4.1 Tony Lindgren
2015-04-03 20:11 ` Olof Johansson
2015-04-03 20:22 ` Olof Johansson
2015-04-03 22:12 ` Tony Lindgren [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150403221230.GW10805@atomide.com \
--to=tony@atomide.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).