From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: wsa@the-dreams.de (Wolfram Sang) Date: Sat, 4 Apr 2015 17:34:47 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] i2c: cadence: Handling Slave monitor mode In-Reply-To: <9ef3c612-b803-4937-bb21-0fac03969f39@BN1AFFO11FD037.protection.gbl> References: <20150327153713.GC27238@katana> <20150402202909.GA3501@katana> <9ef3c612-b803-4937-bb21-0fac03969f39@BN1AFFO11FD037.protection.gbl> Message-ID: <20150404153447.GA3808@katana> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org > > So, it is kind of flooding the bus until the timeout? That is not a single zero > > byte message. > > > It will not flooding the bus until the timeout. Once it fails to access the bus it will be ideal for 15 clock cycles. Master again retrying to access the > Slave immediately after the 15 clock cycles (There is a register in the controller to set the retry value min: 0 cycles, max: 16 cycles).This process will repeat until > The software timeout will happen (1000msec). Compared to do one access only this is "kind of flooding", no? -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 819 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: