linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com (Boris Brezillon)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] clk: change clk_ops' ->round_rate() prototype
Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2015 17:30:06 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150419173006.0ce6cfe0@bbrezillon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7408975.lBcgZIN9hf@diego>

Hi Heiko,

On Sun, 19 Apr 2015 14:13:04 +0200
Heiko St?bner <heiko@sntech.de> wrote:

> Hi Boris,
> 
> Am Freitag, 17. April 2015, 09:29:28 schrieb Boris Brezillon:
> > Clock rates are stored in an unsigned long field, but ->round_rate()
> > (which returns a rounded rate from a requested one) returns a long
> > value (errors are reported using negative error codes), which can lead
> > to long overflow if the clock rate exceed 2Ghz.
> > 
> > Change ->round_rate() prototype to return 0 or an error code, and pass the
> > requested rate as a pointer so that it can be adjusted depending on
> > hardware capabilities.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
> > ---
> 
> On a rk3288-veyron-pinky with the fix described below:
> Tested-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
> 
> 
> > diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk.c b/drivers/clk/clk.c
> > index fa5a00e..1462ddc 100644
> > --- a/drivers/clk/clk.c
> > +++ b/drivers/clk/clk.c
> > @@ -1640,8 +1643,10 @@ static struct clk_core *clk_calc_new_rates(struct
> > clk_core *clk, &parent_hw);
> >  		parent = parent_hw ? parent_hw->core : NULL;
> >  	} else if (clk->ops->round_rate) {
> > -		new_rate = clk->ops->round_rate(clk->hw, rate,
> > -						&best_parent_rate);
> > +		if (clk->ops->round_rate(clk->hw, &new_rate,
> > +					 &best_parent_rate))
> > +			return NULL;
> > +
> >  		if (new_rate < min_rate || new_rate > max_rate)
> >  			return NULL;
> >  	} else if (!parent || !(clk->flags & CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT)) {
> 
> This is using new_rate uninitialized when calling into the round_rate
> callback. Which in turn pushed my PLLs up to 2.2GHz :-)

Indeed, thanks for the fix.

[...]

> 
> 
> And as I've stumbled onto this recently too, the clock-maintainership has
> expanded to Stephen Boyd and linux-clk at vger.kernel.org .

Noted. I'll add Stephen and the new linux-clk ML in the recipient list
next time.

Best Regards,

Boris


-- 
Boris Brezillon, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com

  reply	other threads:[~2015-04-19 15:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <1429255769-13639-1-git-send-email-boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
2015-04-17  7:29 ` [PATCH 1/2] clk: change clk_ops' ->round_rate() prototype Boris Brezillon
2015-04-19 12:13   ` Heiko Stübner
2015-04-19 15:30     ` Boris Brezillon [this message]
2015-04-28 15:11   ` Mikko Perttunen
2015-04-17  7:29 ` [PATCH 2/2] clk: change clk_ops' ->determine_rate() prototype Boris Brezillon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150419173006.0ce6cfe0@bbrezillon \
    --to=boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).