From: linux@arm.linux.org.uk (Russell King - ARM Linux)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Fscking OMAP
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2015 17:04:00 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150420160400.GX4027@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150420154912.GW4027@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 04:49:13PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> Guys,
>
> If you're going to introduce a dependency on some infrastructure which
> you absolutely require for booting, then _please_ ensure that the
> configuration system is updated such that pre-existing kernel
> configurations continue to work.
>
> Don't leave it such that the infrastructure ends up returning -ENOSYS,
> which then filters down into your SoC specific code, and aborts the
> initialisation of critical infrastructure, leaving you with a totally
> silent boot failure.
>
> In this case, it's the addition of syscon to OMAP internals,
> specifically in omap_control_init().
>
> This is explicitly targetted at OMAP people, who have wasted much of
> my day today investigating why their platforms no longer boot in DT
> mode.
Let's be clear about how this needs to be fixed:
1. OMAP must select MFD_SYSCON in its Kconfig when DT is enabled, since
OMAP silently fails to boot when this symbol is not enabled.
2. omap_clk_init() really needs to have some diagnostic printk()s in
it to indicate when something like omap_control_init() fails.
3. omap_clk_init() probably should _not_ return immediately when one
of the children (such as omap_control_init) fails to initialise, as
omitting the clocks pretty much ensures that the kernel will BUG()
a few moments later in the timer code.
--
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 10.5Mbps down 400kbps up
according to speedtest.net.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-04-20 16:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-04-20 15:49 Fscking OMAP Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-04-20 16:04 ` Russell King - ARM Linux [this message]
2015-04-20 16:25 ` Tony Lindgren
2015-04-20 17:14 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-04-20 17:20 ` Tony Lindgren
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150420160400.GX4027@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk \
--to=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).