From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com (Boris Brezillon)
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2015 12:08:17 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] ARM: at91/dt: kizbox: update and rename to at91-kizbox
In-Reply-To: <5536208E.4060105@overkiz.com>
References: <1429521218-9752-1-git-send-email-g.portay@overkiz.com>
 <20150421091100.6bb8ba36@bbrezillon> <5536208E.4060105@overkiz.com>
Message-ID: <20150421120817.6d368c42@bbrezillon>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Tue, 21 Apr 2015 12:03:58 +0200
Ga?l PORTAY <g.portay@overkiz.com> wrote:

> On 21/04/2015 09:11, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> > Hi Gael,
> >
> > On Mon, 20 Apr 2015 11:13:38 +0200
> > Ga?l PORTAY <g.portay@overkiz.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Sort nodes, rename to match Atmel naming convention
> > You should use -M when you generate your patches with format-patch: it
> > keeps track of files that have been renamed instead of considering it
> > as a removal + an addition.
> 
> Ok, thanks, I did not know that option...
> 
> >> and update the features
> >> below:
> >>   - command-line,
> >>   - use proper serial uart,
> >>   - rename leds and gpio-keys,
> >>   - update to pwm-leds and
> >>   - fix gpio-key level.
> > Please split this patch so we can easily review the changes.
> > How about the following separation ?
> >
> > - rename dts file
> > - use stdout-path
> > - sanitize bootargs
> > - led related changes (rename + pwm-leds)
> > - gpio-key related changes (rename + fix level)
> 
> In fact, each changes were committed in single patch before I submitted 
> them...
> 
> I just squashed them thinking it would be easier for you to check (only) 
> for the "new" device-tree.... my bad :(
> 
> What about the node re-order? Do you prefer in dedicated commit or with 
> the rename patch?

Keep it separated from the rename patch.

-- 
Boris Brezillon, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com