From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: moinejf@free.fr (Jean-Francois Moine) Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2015 19:44:45 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] ARM: mvebu: dove: Relicense the device tree under GPLv2+/X11 In-Reply-To: <553FB6B4.8020401@gmail.com> References: <1430125744-3550-1-git-send-email-sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com> <20150428155910.GD12732@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <553FB6B4.8020401@gmail.com> Message-ID: <20150428194445.2ba2f337@armhf> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Tue, 28 Apr 2015 18:35:00 +0200 Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote: > On 28.04.2015 17:59, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 11:09:04AM +0200, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote: > >> The current implicit GPL only licensing on the device tree makes it > >> very impractical for other software components licensed under another > >> license. > >> > >> In order to make it easier for them to reuse our device trees, > >> relicense our device trees under a GPL/X11 dual-license. > >> > [...] > >> so I decided to keep the whole relicensing in a single patch. Please send > >> your Acked-by's in reply to this patch if you are happy with the relicensing. > > > > I normally don't include the "or later version" for my license changes > > as I've only accepted to contribute under the terms of GPLv2. > > Ok, I guess this is a NACK for GPLv2+ but an Acked-by if we limit the > GPL part to GPLv2 only? > > If so, is everybody else who already Acked the GPLv2+ part also fine > with reducing the GPL version to "version 2 only" ? Acked-by: Jean-Francois Moine -- Ken ar c'henta? | ** Breizh ha Linux atav! ** Jef | http://moinejf.free.fr/