linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sboyd@codeaurora.org (Stephen Boyd)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH RFC v1 3/5] clk: remove unneeded __clk_enable and __clk_disable
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2015 15:05:48 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150430220548.GA31047@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <55427DDE.4090907@codeaurora.org>

On 04/30, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> On 04/15/15 07:26, Dong Aisheng wrote:
> > The only thing __clk_enable/__clk_disable does is NULL pointer checking
> > of clk except calling clk_core_{enable|disable} which is already handled
> > by clk_core_{enable|disable}.
> > So remove this unneeded function.
> >
> > Cc: Mike Turquette <mturquette@linaro.org>
> > Cc: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Dong Aisheng <aisheng.dong@freescale.com>
> > ---
> 
> No. You can call clk_enable() and clk_disable() with NULL and it should
> be a no-op. With this change it would cause a NULL pointer exception.
> 

Here's the proper patch. I'll leave you as author.

---8<---
diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk.c b/drivers/clk/clk.c
index 0227ac3d5b1a..e45255226ffa 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/clk.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/clk.c
@@ -1023,14 +1023,6 @@ static void clk_core_disable(struct clk_core *core)
 	clk_core_disable(core->parent);
 }
 
-static void __clk_disable(struct clk *clk)
-{
-	if (!clk)
-		return;
-
-	clk_core_disable(clk->core);
-}
-
 /**
  * clk_disable - gate a clock
  * @clk: the clk being gated
@@ -1051,7 +1043,7 @@ void clk_disable(struct clk *clk)
 		return;
 
 	flags = clk_enable_lock();
-	__clk_disable(clk);
+	clk_core_disable(clk->core);
 	clk_enable_unlock(flags);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(clk_disable);
@@ -1089,14 +1081,6 @@ static int clk_core_enable(struct clk_core *core)
 	return 0;
 }
 
-static int __clk_enable(struct clk *clk)
-{
-	if (!clk)
-		return 0;
-
-	return clk_core_enable(clk->core);
-}
-
 /**
  * clk_enable - ungate a clock
  * @clk: the clk being ungated
@@ -1115,8 +1099,11 @@ int clk_enable(struct clk *clk)
 	unsigned long flags;
 	int ret;
 
+	if (!clk)
+		return 0;
+
 	flags = clk_enable_lock();
-	ret = __clk_enable(clk);
+	ret = clk_core_enable(clk->core);
 	clk_enable_unlock(flags);
 
 	return ret;

-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project

  reply	other threads:[~2015-04-30 22:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-04-15 14:26 [PATCH RFC v1 0/5] clk: support clocks which requires parent clock on during operation Dong Aisheng
2015-04-15 14:26 ` [PATCH RFC v1 1/5] clk: change clk_core name of __clk_set_parent_after Dong Aisheng
2015-04-30 19:06   ` Stephen Boyd
2015-05-04  8:15     ` Dong Aisheng
2015-04-15 14:26 ` [PATCH RFC v1 2/5] clk: add missing lock when call clk_core_enable in clk_set_parent Dong Aisheng
2015-04-30 19:07   ` Stephen Boyd
2015-05-04  8:35     ` Dong Aisheng
2015-05-07  0:01       ` Stephen Boyd
2015-05-13  9:21         ` Dong Aisheng
2015-04-15 14:26 ` [PATCH RFC v1 3/5] clk: remove unneeded __clk_enable and __clk_disable Dong Aisheng
2015-04-30 19:09   ` Stephen Boyd
2015-04-30 22:05     ` Stephen Boyd [this message]
2015-05-04  8:16       ` Dong Aisheng
2015-04-15 14:26 ` [PATCH RFC v1 4/5] clk: core: add CLK_SET_PARENT_ON flags to support clocks require parent on Dong Aisheng
2015-05-01  1:09   ` Stephen Boyd
2015-05-04 10:36     ` Dong Aisheng
2015-05-06 23:34       ` Stephen Boyd
2015-05-13  9:20         ` Dong Aisheng
2015-04-15 14:26 ` [PATCH RFC v1 5/5] clk: introduce clk_core_enable_lock and clk_core_disable_lock functions Dong Aisheng
2015-05-01  1:10   ` Stephen Boyd
2015-05-04 10:38     ` Dong Aisheng
2015-04-22  6:12 ` [PATCH RFC v1 0/5] clk: support clocks which requires parent clock on during operation Dong Aisheng
2015-04-30  2:37   ` Dong Aisheng

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150430220548.GA31047@codeaurora.org \
    --to=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).