From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: baruch@tkos.co.il (Baruch Siach) Date: Sun, 3 May 2015 10:55:49 +0300 Subject: [PATCH 2/4] mtd: mxc_nand: limit the size of used oob In-Reply-To: References: <20150426200725.GC19431@pengutronix.de> <20150427043906.GR2258@tarshish> <20150427071238.GE19431@pengutronix.de> <20150427072057.GT2258@tarshish> <20150427075023.GF19431@pengutronix.de> <20150427114341.GW2258@tarshish> <20150427193127.GU19431@pengutronix.de> <20150429061853.GB2258@tarshish> <20150429063508.GE19431@pengutronix.de> Message-ID: <20150503075549.GH2265@tarshish> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi Fabio, On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 12:20:32PM -0300, Fabio Estevam wrote: > On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 3:35 AM, Uwe Kleine-K?nig > wrote: > > > That's surprising. It would be interesting to hear from Freescale what > > is wrong here (Fabio? Maybe contact support?). I quickly skimmed through > > the errata documents but didn't found anything. So it's not only that > > Yes, that's something I am not aware of either. > > Please contact the FSL support folks so that the hardware guys could > assist on this topic. Our past experience with hardware support at the micro level was not all that great. Anyway, I dropped the limit to 128 for oobsize < 218, since this is only a theoretic bug, and I can't really test it. Thanks, baruch -- http://baruch.siach.name/blog/ ~. .~ Tk Open Systems =}------------------------------------------------ooO--U--Ooo------------{= - baruch@tkos.co.il - tel: +972.2.679.5364, http://www.tkos.co.il -