From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: pali.rohar@gmail.com (Pali =?utf-8?q?Roh=C3=A1r?=) Date: Tue, 5 May 2015 18:39:36 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 0/3] Drop more omap3 legacy board-*.c files for v4.2 In-Reply-To: <20150505150638.GC21061@atomide.com> References: <1430769717-4088-1-git-send-email-tony@atomide.com> <20150505145407.GK18002@pali> <20150505150638.GC21061@atomide.com> Message-ID: <201505051839.36882@pali> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Tuesday 05 May 2015 17:06:38 Tony Lindgren wrote: > * Pali Roh?r [150505 07:55]: > > On Tuesday 05 May 2015 07:43:08 Tony Lindgren wrote: > > > * Arnd Bergmann [150505 03:56]: > > > > On Monday 04 May 2015 13:01:54 Tony Lindgren wrote: > > > > > For dropping the remaining omap3 legacy boot support, > > > > > we still have the following board-*.c files: > > > > > > > > > > BOARD REASON NEEDED > > > > > board-ldp.c Still used in RMKs boot test > > > > > system board-omap3logic.c Getting a .dts file > > > > > for v4.2 board-omap3pandora.c Got a .dts file for > > > > > v4.1 board-rx51-*.c Needs /proc/atags > > > > > support for user space > > > > > > > > > > I'm hoping we can drop those for v4.3 merge window, > > > > > then keep the platform data around for one more merge > > > > > window in case of reverting needed, then drop the > > > > > platform data too for v4.4 if no issues needing > > > > > reverting are found. > > > > > > > > Sounds great. Has there been a conclusion about what to > > > > do for the rx51 /proc/atags support? > > > > > > I believe we just need to enable /proc/atags also for > > > device tree based booting if CONFIG_ARM_ATAG_DTB_COMPAT. > > > Pali may have more info on that. > > > > > > Then looks like Pali's two patches for showing the > > > revision are still pending in thread "[PATCH v2 0/2] ARM: > > > /proc/cpuinfo: DT: Add support for Revision": > > > > > > http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg401535.html > > > > I think I already sent all need patches to ML. But I did not > > check if you merged them or not. I did not get any new > > comments for them for a while and right now I do not have > > time for looking at it again. > > Oh OK, do you have link to the /proc/atags patch somewhere? > > Maybe Arnd and Nico can pick them up and sort out how we > should queue them with Russell? > https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/1/26/648 -- Pali Roh?r pali.rohar at gmail.com -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. URL: