From: will.deacon@arm.com (Will Deacon)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] arm64: bpf: fix signedness bug in loading 64-bit immediate
Date: Fri, 8 May 2015 09:38:57 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150508083856.GA2125@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1431063591-16668-1-git-send-email-xi.wang@gmail.com>
On Fri, May 08, 2015 at 06:39:51AM +0100, Xi Wang wrote:
> Consider "(u64)insn1.imm << 32 | imm" in the arm64 JIT. Since imm is
> signed 32-bit, it is sign-extended to 64-bit, losing the high 32 bits.
> The fix is to convert imm to u32 first and zero-extend it to u64.
>
> Also extend test_bpf to catch this JIT bug; the interpreter is correct.
>
> Before:
> test_bpf: #58 load 64-bit immediate ret -1 != 1 FAIL (1 times)
>
> After:
> test_bpf: #58 load 64-bit immediate 74 PASS
>
> Fixes: 30d3d94cc3d5 ("arm64: bpf: add 'load 64-bit immediate' instruction")
> Cc: Zi Shen Lim <zlim.lnx@gmail.com>
> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Xi Wang <xi.wang@gmail.com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 2 +-
> lib/test_bpf.c | 3 ++-
> 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c b/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
> index edba042b2325..14cdc099fda0 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
> @@ -487,7 +487,7 @@ emit_cond_jmp:
> return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> - imm64 = (u64)insn1.imm << 32 | imm;
> + imm64 = ((u64)(u32)insn1.imm) << 32 | (u64)(u32)imm;
This seems a bit convoluted to me. Don't you just need to add a (u32)
cast to imm and that's it? The (u64)(u32) looks redundant.
> emit_a64_mov_i64(dst, imm64, ctx);
>
> return 1;
> diff --git a/lib/test_bpf.c b/lib/test_bpf.c
> index 80d78c51f65f..9f6849891b5f 100644
> --- a/lib/test_bpf.c
> +++ b/lib/test_bpf.c
> @@ -1755,7 +1755,8 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
> BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
> BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, R3, 0x1234, 1),
> BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
> - BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_MOV, R0, 1),
> + BPF_LD_IMM64(R0, 0x1ffffffffLL),
> + BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_RSH, R0, 32), /* R0 = 1 */
> BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
This hunk should probably be a separate patch, unless you get Alexei's ack
for me to take it via the arm64 tree too.
Will
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-05-08 8:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-05-08 5:39 [PATCH] arm64: bpf: fix signedness bug in loading 64-bit immediate Xi Wang
2015-05-08 8:38 ` Will Deacon [this message]
2015-05-08 8:45 ` Xi Wang
2015-05-08 15:17 ` Will Deacon
2015-05-08 15:30 ` Alexei Starovoitov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150508083856.GA2125@arm.com \
--to=will.deacon@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).