From: dyoung@redhat.com (Dave Young)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [v2 0/5] arm64: add kdump support
Date: Tue, 12 May 2015 13:43:04 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150512054304.GA29874@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <55504956.9020007@linaro.org>
On 05/11/15 at 03:16pm, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
> Hi
>
> Sorry for late response. I was on vacation.
>
> On 04/24/2015 06:53 PM, Mark Rutland wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 08:53:03AM +0100, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
> >>This patch set enables kdump (crash dump kernel) support on arm64 on top of
> >>Geoff's kexec patchset.
> >>
> >>In this version, there are some arm64-specific usage/constraints:
> >>1) "mem=" boot parameter must be specified on crash dump kernel
> >> if the system starts on uefi.
> >
> >This sounds very painful. Why is this the case, and how do x86 and/or
> >ia64 get around that?
>
> As Dave (Young) said, x86 uses "memmap=XX" kernel commandline parameters
> to specify usable memory for crash dump kernel.
Originally x86 use memmap=exactmap memmap=XX to specify each section of
memories for 2nd kernel. But later because a lot of reserved type ranges
need to be passed ie. for pci mmconfig, and kernel cmdline buffer is
limited so kexec-tools later switch to passing these in x86 boot params as
E820 memory ranges directly.
> On my arm64 implementation, "linux,usable-memory" property is added
> to device tree blob by kexec-tools for this purpose.
> This is because, when I first implemented kdump on arm64, ppc is the only
> architecture that supports kdump AND utilizes device trees.
> Since kexec-tools as well as the kernel already has this framework,
> I believed that device-tree approach was smarter than a commandline
> parameter.
>
> However, uefi-based kernel ignores all the memory-related properties
> in a device tree and so this "mem=" workaround was added.
Kdump kernel reuses the memmap info getting from firmware during 1st kernel
boot, I do not think the memmap info can be cooked for crash kernel usable
memory. But it might be a better way to use a special fdt node for crash
kernel memory even for UEFI..
Another way is introducing a similar memmap=, but maybe consider only
system_ram type ranges. For other memory areas still use UEFI memmap.
Thanks
Dave
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-05-12 5:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-04-24 7:53 [v2 0/5] arm64: add kdump support AKASHI Takahiro
2015-04-24 7:53 ` [v2 1/5] arm64: kdump: reserve memory for crash dump kernel AKASHI Takahiro
2015-04-24 10:11 ` Mark Rutland
2015-05-11 6:44 ` AKASHI Takahiro
2015-04-28 9:19 ` Baoquan He
2015-05-11 7:38 ` AKASHI Takahiro
2015-05-11 7:54 ` Baoquan He
2015-05-11 8:17 ` AKASHI Takahiro
2015-05-11 9:41 ` Baoquan He
2015-05-12 7:32 ` AKASHI Takahiro
2015-04-24 7:53 ` [v2 2/5] arm64: kdump: implement machine_crash_shutdown() AKASHI Takahiro
2015-04-24 10:39 ` Mark Rutland
2015-04-24 10:43 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-08-06 7:09 ` AKASHI Takahiro
2015-08-06 15:51 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-08-07 4:24 ` AKASHI Takahiro
2015-05-11 7:10 ` AKASHI Takahiro
2015-05-22 5:56 ` AKASHI Takahiro
2015-04-24 7:53 ` [v2 3/5] arm64: kdump: do not go into EL2 before starting a crash dump kernel AKASHI Takahiro
2015-04-24 7:53 ` [v2 4/5] arm64: add kdump support AKASHI Takahiro
2015-05-08 12:19 ` Dave Young
2015-05-11 7:47 ` Dave Young
2015-05-11 7:58 ` AKASHI Takahiro
2015-05-11 8:39 ` Dave Young
2015-04-24 7:53 ` [v2 5/5] arm64: enable kdump in the arm64 defconfig AKASHI Takahiro
2015-04-24 9:53 ` [v2 0/5] arm64: add kdump support Mark Rutland
2015-05-11 6:16 ` AKASHI Takahiro
2015-05-12 5:43 ` Dave Young [this message]
2015-05-18 8:08 ` AKASHI Takahiro
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150512054304.GA29874@localhost.localdomain \
--to=dyoung@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).