From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: tony@atomide.com (Tony Lindgren) Date: Tue, 12 May 2015 07:13:49 -0700 Subject: [PATCH 1/1] gpio: omap: Fix PM runtime issue and remove most BANK_USED macros In-Reply-To: References: <1429632533-23285-1-git-send-email-tony@atomide.com> Message-ID: <20150512141348.GG15563@atomide.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org * Linus Walleij [150512 02:01]: > On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 6:08 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote: > > > Looks like omap_gpio_irq_type can return early at several places > > leaving a GPIO bank enabled without doing pm_runtime_put if wrong > > GPIO arguments are passed. > > > > Instead of adding more complicated BANK_USED macros, let's fix the > > issue properly. We can pass is_irq flag to omap_enable_gpio_module > > and omap_disble_gpio_module. And with that we can remove all the > > similar code elsewhere to get rid of most BANK_USED macros. > > > > Note that the reason for the BANK_USED macro is that we need to manage > > PM runtime on per GPIO bank basis. In the long run we want to move to > > using PM runtime counts for each GPIO line to determine if a GPIO > > bank is used. Once we have a solution for omap_enable_gpio_module > > and omap_disable_gpio_module, we can remove the remaining BANK_USED > > macros. > > > > Cc: Felipe Balbi > > Cc: Grygorii Strashko > > Cc: Javier Martinez Canillas > > Cc: Nishanth Menon > > Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren > > There is so much discussion around this patch that I can't make > up my mind whether I should apply this or some subsequent inline > version of it. > > Holding this off for now... Yeah let's see what Grygorii comes up, sounds like he may have a minimal fix coming up. Then we can do the rest as clean-up later on. Regards, Tony