From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: balbi@ti.com (Felipe Balbi) Date: Tue, 12 May 2015 11:19:45 -0500 Subject: [PATCH V4 1/3] OPP: Redefine bindings to overcome shortcomings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20150512161945.GE8699@saruman.tx.rr.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 05:37:59PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote: > Current OPP (Operating performance point) DT bindings are proven to be > insufficient at multiple instances. > > The shortcomings we are trying to solve here: > > - Getting clock sharing information between CPUs. Single shared clock vs > independent clock per core vs shared clock per cluster. > > - Support for specifying current levels along with voltages. > > - Support for multiple regulators. > > - Support for turbo modes. > > - Other per OPP settings: transition latencies, disabled status, etc.? > > - Expandability of OPPs in future. > > This patch introduces new bindings "operating-points-v2" to get these problems operating-points-v2 is kinda awkward, how about operating-points-extended, much like interrupts-extended ? Other than this, I very much like the new approach. Regards -- balbi -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 819 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: