From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: wsa@the-dreams.de (Wolfram Sang) Date: Tue, 12 May 2015 21:28:38 +0200 Subject: [PATCH v2 10/17] i2c: add locomo i2c driver In-Reply-To: References: <1430178954-11138-1-git-send-email-dbaryshkov@gmail.com> <1430178954-11138-11-git-send-email-dbaryshkov@gmail.com> <20150512192413.GE4449@schokonusskuchen.bad> Message-ID: <20150512192837.GF4449@schokonusskuchen.bad> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 10:27:07PM +0300, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov wrote: > 2015-05-12 22:24 GMT+03:00 Wolfram Sang : > > On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 02:55:47AM +0300, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov wrote: > >> LoCoMo chip contains a tiny i2c controller destined to control > >> M62332 DAC. Provide a separate I2C driver for this cell. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov > > > > Thanks for the submission! > > > >> +#include > >> +#include > >> +#include > >> +#include > >> +#include > >> +#include > >> + > >> +#include > >> +#include > > > > To avoid duplicates, I prefer the includes to be sorted. No need to > > resend because of that, though. > > > > Kudos for brushing up old code! Do you want the drivers go via the > > subsystem trees? Or is there a dependency so it should go in via some > > other tree in one go? > > There is a header dependency -- is a new header. > I'd prefer for these patches to go in via one of MFD, arm-soc or ARM trees > as a whole series (if that would be ok with respective maintainers). Fine with me. Reviewed-by: Wolfram Sang -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 836 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: