From: u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de (Uwe Kleine-König)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Automatic clock disabling on clk_put()
Date: Wed, 13 May 2015 08:45:50 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150513064550.GE28888@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <55528B84.5050700@codeaurora.org>
Hello,
On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 04:23:48PM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> On 05/10/15 23:01, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Since we now have per-user clks we could automatically disable clks on
> > clk_put() to make the drivers errors paths easier. AFAIR that was one
> > of the motivations to switch to per user clks. Is this just not yet
> > implemented or are there problems implementing this?
>
> I don't recall that as being a motivation for per-user clks. The
> documentation explicitly states:
>
> * Note: drivers must ensure that all clk_enable calls made on this
> * clock source are balanced by clk_disable calls prior to calling
> * this function.
>
> so it seems that such a behavior would be an API change. Is it really
well, it's a compatible API change. So if you continue to use it as you
were obliged to do before, everything is fine. IMHO the introduction of
per-user clocks are a much bigger issue.
I'm not sure that auto disabling is a good idea[1], but at least giving a
warning should be possible.
> that hard to call clk_disable_unprepare() on a clock at the end of an
> error path? Maybe you could add a devm_clk_get_prepare_enable() that
> does what you want and then call clk_disable_unprepare on the exit path?
You mean clk_disable_unprepare is called in the same function that calls
clk_put I assume such that you don't have to do anything in the exit
path.
Best regards
Uwe
[1] mainly because I didn't think about it
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-K?nig |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-05-13 6:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-05-11 6:01 Automatic clock disabling on clk_put() Sascha Hauer
2015-05-12 23:23 ` Stephen Boyd
2015-05-13 6:45 ` Uwe Kleine-König [this message]
2015-05-13 19:45 ` Stephen Boyd
2015-05-13 20:12 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-05-13 6:47 ` Sascha Hauer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150513064550.GE28888@pengutronix.de \
--to=u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).