From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: baruch@tkos.co.il (Baruch Siach) Date: Wed, 13 May 2015 11:32:34 +0300 Subject: [PATCH v7 0/4] ARM: SoC: add a new platform, UniPhier (arch/arm/mach-uniphier) In-Reply-To: <2230140.n6kW8LSSaP@wuerfel> References: <1431058034-5508-1-git-send-email-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> <2101307.fSn8Z2ZyBq@wuerfel> <2230140.n6kW8LSSaP@wuerfel> Message-ID: <20150513083234.GP2558@tarshish> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi Arnd, On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 09:48:33AM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > For sending pull requests, it would be good to have a gpg key that > is signed by other well-known kernel developers. If you have such > a key, you can also request a kernel.org account to host a git tree > there, or you can host a git tree somewhere on your company's domain. > A public hosting service like github is not as good for us, but we > can deal with it when you are still ramping up your infrastructure. > Let me know if you need help finding kernel developers to sign your key. Is a pull request from a kernel.org repo trusted more than the key itself? In other words, if I sign my pull request with a trusted key, why would the git repo location make any difference? baruch -- http://baruch.siach.name/blog/ ~. .~ Tk Open Systems =}------------------------------------------------ooO--U--Ooo------------{= - baruch at tkos.co.il - tel: +972.2.679.5364, http://www.tkos.co.il -