From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: sboyd@codeaurora.org (Stephen Boyd) Date: Wed, 13 May 2015 11:09:36 -0700 Subject: [PATCHv2] ARM: socfpga: dts: Add a clock node for sdmmc CIU In-Reply-To: <5553671E.3070301@opensource.altera.com> References: <1429027519-22209-1-git-send-email-dinguyen@opensource.altera.com> <20150513075438.GE15988@codeaurora.org> <5553671E.3070301@opensource.altera.com> Message-ID: <20150513180936.GG15988@codeaurora.org> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 05/13, Dinh Nguyen wrote: > > > On 5/13/15 2:54 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote: > > On 04/14, dinguyen at opensource.altera.com wrote: > >> From: Dinh Nguyen > >> > >> The CIU(Card Interface Unit) get its clock from the sdmmc_clk_divided clock > >> which is used to clock the card. The sdmmc_clk_divided clock is the sdmmc_clk > >> passed through a fixed divider of 4. This patch adds the sdmmc_clk_divided > >> node and makes the sdmmc_clk it's parent. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Dinh Nguyen > >> --- > > > > Is this a fix of some sort? I'm confused why this was sent to the > > clk maintainers when it seems to be more appropriate to go > > through the arm-soc tree. > > > > Ok, sorry about that. I thought since it was clock nodes, it would > appropriate to CC clk maintainers. Sure, Cc is fine, but I believe the mail was sent "To" us so that led to my confusion. > > BTW, can I take patches from drivers/clk/socfpga/* through the arm-soc > tree or would that go through you guys? > Unless there's some sort of complicated dependency between the clk tree and the arm-soc tree I'd prefer any patches against drivers/clk/* go through the clk tree. -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project