linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: viresh.kumar@linaro.org (Viresh Kumar)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: smp_twd fix for adapting to cpu frequency change
Date: Fri, 15 May 2015 08:54:36 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150515032436.GF6348@linux> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150514144856.GA2067@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>

On 14-05-15, 15:48, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> This is not correct.
> 
> int __clockevents_update_freq(struct clock_event_device *dev, u32 freq)
> {
>         clockevents_config(dev, freq);
> 
>         if (dev->state == CLOCK_EVT_STATE_ONESHOT)
>                 return clockevents_program_event(dev, dev->next_event, false);
> 
>         if (dev->state == CLOCK_EVT_STATE_PERIODIC)
>                 return __clockevents_set_state(dev, CLOCK_EVT_STATE_PERIODIC);
> 
> The last two lines re-set the mode to periodic, which cause the ->set_mode
> (or its replacement) to be called.  When the driver's ->set_mode method is
> called, it is supposed to write the periodic timeout to the hardware.
> 
> So, this has the side effect of updating the hardware with the new timeout
> value.
> 
> The downside to this is that if you keep changing the clock rate before
> the TWD expires, you'll never see an interrupt from it, as you'll always
> re-start a new period from the beginning on every clock frequency change.

Ahh, this was correct when it was discussed earlier.

Commit fe79a9ba1196 ("clockevents: Adjust timer interval when
frequency changes"), fixed this in clockevents core.

-- 
viresh

      reply	other threads:[~2015-05-15  3:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-05-03 11:15 smp_twd fix for adapting to cpu frequency change shiraz hashim
2012-05-08 11:33 ` Linus Walleij
2012-05-08 11:40   ` Thomas Gleixner
2012-05-11  9:21   ` Shiraz Hashim
2012-05-11 12:46     ` Linus Walleij
2015-05-14 14:44   ` Viresh Kumar
2015-05-14 14:48     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-05-15  3:24       ` Viresh Kumar [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150515032436.GF6348@linux \
    --to=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).