From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: wsa@the-dreams.de (Wolfram Sang) Date: Tue, 19 May 2015 08:16:19 +0200 Subject: How to encode being an I2C slave in DT? In-Reply-To: References: <1427745615-5428-1-git-send-email-danindrey@mail.ru> <20150403194635.GC2016@katana> <1549160.njMIY2NVTi@fb07-iapwap2> <20150505105513.GA1841@katana> <554922EF.3050906@wwwdotorg.org> <20150506161712.GA4003@katana> Message-ID: <20150519061619.GA4448@schokonusskuchen.bad> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org > > I give in to the flag idea. I also noticed that we'd need another flag > > anyhow to mark 10 bit addresses. I am still thinking between using two > > address-cells in that case (clean seperation between address and flags) > > or to encode the flags as MSB in the current address (all busses will > > have same address-cells and child description, less code paths and no > > overhead in dtbs). > > Reading thru the thread, this seems good to me. I would go with adding > flags in the MSB of the reg cell rather than adding a cell. Thanks. I was leaning to the MSB idea, too, and am currently checking how the code would look like. Feels much better to do knowing that it is basically upstream compatible ;) -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 836 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: