From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: robert.richter@caviumnetworks.com (Robert Richter) Date: Wed, 20 May 2015 14:31:59 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 4/4] arm64: gicv3: its: Increase FORCE_MAX_ZONEORDER for Cavium ThunderX In-Reply-To: <20150520132213.1128eb90@why.wild-wind.fr.eu.org> References: <1430686172-18222-1-git-send-email-rric@kernel.org> <1430686172-18222-5-git-send-email-rric@kernel.org> <20150505105329.GC1550@arm.com> <20150511091438.GW4251@rric.localhost> <20150512123056.GA2062@arm.com> <20150512162049.GP10428@rric.localhost> <20150512172416.GF2062@arm.com> <20150520132213.1128eb90@why.wild-wind.fr.eu.org> Message-ID: <20150520123159.GE10428@rric.localhost> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 20.05.15 13:22:13, Marc Zyngier wrote: > On Tue, 12 May 2015 18:24:16 +0100 > Will Deacon wrote: > > On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 05:20:49PM +0100, Robert Richter wrote: > > > On 12.05.15 13:30:57, Will Deacon wrote: > > > For allocation of 16MB cont. phys mem of a defconfig kernel (4KB > > > default pagesize) I see this different approaches: > > > > 16MB sounds like an awful lot. Is this because you have tonnes of MSIs or > > a sparse DeviceID space or both? > > That's probably due to the sparseness of the DeviceID space. With some > form of bridge number encoded on top of the BFD number, the device > table is enormous, and I don't see a nice way to avoid it... Right. At the momement out of 21 bits (16MB) we currently have 2 spare bits, which reduces the actually size used to 4MB. Though, for the current cpu model we can reduce it at least to 8MB total. I will come up with an additional patch setting this to 8MB. As said before, I also write on a patch to use CMA. Thanks, -Robert