From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: antoine.tenart@free-electrons.com (Antoine Tenart) Date: Wed, 20 May 2015 16:04:16 +0200 Subject: [PATCH v5 05/12] mtd: pxa3xx_nand: rework flash detection and timing setup In-Reply-To: <555C928C.1010909@vanguardiasur.com.ar> References: <1431356341-31640-1-git-send-email-antoine.tenart@free-electrons.com> <1431356341-31640-6-git-send-email-antoine.tenart@free-electrons.com> <555128F0.30702@vanguardiasur.com.ar> <20150512143943.GC32171@kwain> <5557B54B.9010307@vanguardiasur.com.ar> <20150520135531.GK22054@kwain> <555C928C.1010909@vanguardiasur.com.ar> Message-ID: <20150520140416.GM22054@kwain> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 10:56:28AM -0300, Ezequiel Garcia wrote: > > > On 05/20/2015 10:55 AM, Antoine Tenart wrote: > > On Sat, May 16, 2015 at 06:23:23PM -0300, Ezequiel Garcia wrote: > >> On 05/12/2015 11:39 AM, Antoine Tenart wrote: > >>> On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 07:10:56PM -0300, Ezequiel Garcia wrote: > >>>> > >>>> On 05/11/2015 11:58 AM, Antoine Tenart wrote: > >>>> [..] > >>>>> - > >>>>> - /* calculate flash information */ > >>>>> - host->read_id_bytes = (f->page_size == 2048) ? 4 : 2; > >>>>> - > >>>> > >>>> [..] > >>>>> @@ -1732,6 +1669,7 @@ static int alloc_nand_resource(struct platform_device *pdev) > >>>>> host->mtd = mtd; > >>>>> host->cs = cs; > >>>>> host->info_data = info; > >>>>> + host->read_id_bytes = 4; > >>>> > >>>> Are you sure this is correct? The value is set according to the page > >>>> size before this patch. > >>> > >>> Before reading the ID, the pxa3xx driver uses a default configuration, > >>> builtin_flash_types[0], which defines a page size of 2048 leading to set > >>> host->read_id_bytes to 4. > >>> > >>> I'm using this default value here. > >>> > >>> There might be an issue, as host->read_id_bytes isn't updated after > >>> reading the ID (and getting the actual page size). I don't know if this > >>> can be a problem. I can modify pxa3xx_nand_config_flash() to update > >>> host->read_id_bytes if needed. What do you think? > >>> > >> > >> Well, once the device is detected, READ_ID shouldn't be used, so I'm not > >> sure what's the point of that. > > > > I don't think there's a need to update read_id_bytes once the device is > > detected. Why don't we stay with 4? > > > > Sure, that's exactly what I was saying. Great! I'll update. Antoine -- Antoine T?nart, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com