From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: viresh.kumar@linaro.org (Viresh Kumar) Date: Fri, 22 May 2015 19:34:57 +0530 Subject: [PATCH V4 1/3] OPP: Redefine bindings to overcome shortcomings In-Reply-To: <555D750F.80304@ti.com> References: <20150512214224.16410.15922@quantum> <20150513085528.GA6994@linux> <555D750F.80304@ti.com> Message-ID: <20150522140457.GB7730@linux> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 21-05-15, 01:02, Nishanth Menon wrote: > This argues that clock is an input to the cpu, this is not in-correct, > but, it could also be argued that OPP tables are clock dependent. > > For example, with multiple clock source options that a device might > choose to select from internally(by some means.. lets not just restrict > ourselves to just CPUs here for a moment), the tables might be > different. We can always debate that this then is the responsibility of > the driver handling the description for that device and we might want > possibility of vice versa as well - same OPP table used by different > clock source selections as well. @Rob: Any inputs ? -- viresh