From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: viresh.kumar@linaro.org (Viresh Kumar) Date: Tue, 26 May 2015 10:44:09 +0530 Subject: [PATCH V5 1/3] OPP: Redefine bindings to overcome shortcomings In-Reply-To: <555D6CC8.9050201@ti.com> References: <51a2603050f7993643fea9e5dcd2dba7a5a3fe23.1432091956.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org> <555D6CC8.9050201@ti.com> Message-ID: <20150526051409.GI23464@linux> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 21-05-15, 00:27, Nishanth Menon wrote: > I would suggest adding a link to how future vendor specific extension > docs might look like - maybe this is probably not the time to discuss > this.. but anyways.. we could make some statement to the effect of "SoC > vendor specfic extensions are documented as > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/,opp.txt and should > clearly indicate that the extensions are permitted only under the > operating-points-v2 compatible description." Will this work ?: If required, this can be extended for SoC vendor specfic bindings. Such bindings should be documented as Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/-opp.txt and should have a compatible description like: "operating-points-v2-". -- viresh