From: will.deacon@arm.com (Will Deacon)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RFC/PATCH 1/9] arm: dma-mapping: Don't override dma_ops in arch_setup_dma_ops()
Date: Wed, 27 May 2015 18:38:06 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150527173806.GD4232@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1431644410-2997-2-git-send-email-laurent.pinchart+renesas@ideasonboard.com>
On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 12:00:02AM +0100, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> The arch_setup_dma_ops() function is in charge of setting dma_ops with a
> call to set_dma_ops(). set_dma_ops() is also called from
>
> - highbank and mvebu bus notifiers
> - dmabounce (to be replaced with swiotlb)
> - arm_iommu_attach_device
>
> (arm_iommu_attach_device is itself called from IOMMU and bus master
> device drivers)
>
> To allow the arch_setup_dma_ops() call to be moved from device add time
> to device probe time we must ensure that dma_ops already setup by any of
> the above callers will not be overriden.
>
> Aftering replacing dmabounce with swiotlb, converting IOMMU drivers to
s/Aftering/After/
> of_xlate and taking care of highbank and mvebu, the workaround should be
> removed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart+renesas@ideasonboard.com>
> ---
> arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c | 9 +++++++++
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c b/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c
> index 09c5fe3d30c2..7aa5e339a596 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c
> @@ -2117,6 +2117,15 @@ void arch_setup_dma_ops(struct device *dev, u64 dma_base, u64 size,
> struct dma_map_ops *dma_ops;
>
> dev->archdata.dma_coherent = coherent;
> +
> + /*
> + * Don't override the dma_ops if they have already been set. Ideally
> + * this should be the only location where dma_ops are set, remove this
> + * check when all other callers of set_dma_ops will have disappeared.
> + */
> + if (dev->archdata.dma_ops)
> + return;
Maybe printing a warning at the same time will encourage people to migrate
away from the existing behaviour?
Will
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-05-27 17:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-05-14 23:00 [RFC/PATCH 0/9] IOMMU probe deferral support Laurent Pinchart
2015-05-14 23:00 ` [RFC/PATCH 1/9] arm: dma-mapping: Don't override dma_ops in arch_setup_dma_ops() Laurent Pinchart
2015-05-27 17:38 ` Will Deacon [this message]
2015-05-14 23:00 ` [RFC/PATCH 2/9] arm: dma-mapping: Support IOMMU mappings spanning the full 32 bits range Laurent Pinchart
2015-05-19 10:17 ` Robin Murphy
2015-05-24 22:38 ` Laurent Pinchart
2015-05-14 23:00 ` [RFC/PATCH 3/9] of: dma: Move range size workaround to of_dma_get_range() Laurent Pinchart
2015-05-27 17:59 ` Will Deacon
2015-05-28 2:37 ` Rob Herring
2015-05-14 23:00 ` [RFC/PATCH 4/9] of: dma: Make of_dma_deconfigure() public Laurent Pinchart
2015-05-28 12:42 ` Will Deacon
2015-05-29 14:04 ` Rob Herring
2015-05-14 23:00 ` [RFC/PATCH 5/9] of: dma: Split of_configure_dma() into mask and ops configuration Laurent Pinchart
2015-05-28 13:01 ` Will Deacon
2015-05-29 14:19 ` Rob Herring
2015-05-14 23:00 ` [RFC/PATCH 6/9] drivers: platform: Configure dma operations at probe time Laurent Pinchart
2015-05-15 23:59 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2015-05-19 10:39 ` Robin Murphy
2015-05-24 22:41 ` Laurent Pinchart
2015-05-14 23:00 ` [RFC/PATCH 7/9] iommu: of: Document the of_iommu_configure() function Laurent Pinchart
2015-05-28 13:02 ` Will Deacon
2015-05-14 23:00 ` [RFC/PATCH 8/9] iommu: of: Handle IOMMU lookup failure with deferred probing or error Laurent Pinchart
2015-05-28 13:31 ` Will Deacon
2015-05-14 23:00 ` [RFC/PATCH 9/9] iommu/ipmmu-vmsa: Use DT-based instantiation Laurent Pinchart
2015-05-27 13:26 ` [RFC/PATCH 0/9] IOMMU probe deferral support Marek Szyprowski
2015-05-28 17:36 ` Laura Abbott
2015-06-11 16:25 ` Will Deacon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150527173806.GD4232@arm.com \
--to=will.deacon@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).