From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: b29396@freescale.com (Dong Aisheng) Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 16:25:01 +0800 Subject: [PATCH v2 1/5] clk: remove duplicated code with __clk_set_parent_after In-Reply-To: <20150528040919.22384.79189@quantum> References: <1431610143-21853-1-git-send-email-aisheng.dong@freescale.com> <1431610143-21853-2-git-send-email-aisheng.dong@freescale.com> <20150528040919.22384.79189@quantum> Message-ID: <20150528082459.GA4489@shlinux1.ap.freescale.net> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 09:09:19PM -0700, Michael Turquette wrote: > Quoting Dong Aisheng (2015-05-14 06:28:59) > > __clk_set_parent_after() actually used the second argument then we > > could put this duplicate logic in there and call it with a different > > order of arguments in the success vs. error paths in this function. > > > > Cc: Mike Turquette > > Cc: Stephen Boyd > > Suggested-by: Stephen Boyd > > Signed-off-by: Dong Aisheng > > Patch looks good to me. > Thanks for the review. > Also just noticed that the second argument to __clk_set_parent_after is > never used :-( > Yes, before this patch series, it's never used. :) Regards Dong Aisheng > Regards, > Mike > > > --- > > drivers/clk/clk.c | 8 +------- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 7 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk.c b/drivers/clk/clk.c > > index 659f2b0..0e813ea 100644 > > --- a/drivers/clk/clk.c > > +++ b/drivers/clk/clk.c > > @@ -1159,14 +1159,8 @@ static int __clk_set_parent(struct clk_core *core, struct clk_core *parent, > > flags = clk_enable_lock(); > > clk_reparent(core, old_parent); > > clk_enable_unlock(flags); > > + __clk_set_parent_after(core, old_parent, parent); > > > > - if (core->prepare_count) { > > - flags = clk_enable_lock(); > > - clk_core_disable(core); > > - clk_core_disable(parent); > > - clk_enable_unlock(flags); > > - clk_core_unprepare(parent); > > - } > > return ret; > > } > > > > -- > > 1.9.1 > >