From: Dave.Martin@arm.com (Dave Martin)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH RFC] ARM: use -marm unconditionally for THUMB2_KERNEL=n builds
Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 11:49:24 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150528104923.GC3655@e103592.cambridge.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150527174657.GV2067@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 06:46:57PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 04:59:21PM +0200, Uwe Kleine-K?nig wrote:
> > Hello Russell,
> >
> > On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 10:53:39AM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > > On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 11:42:07AM +0200, Uwe Kleine-K?nig wrote:
> > > > The only possible culprit is a compiler that doesn't understand -marm.
> > > > My compiler collection only goes back to 4.0.3 which does work with this
> > > > option. The use of cc-option to test for -marm was introduced in commit
> > > > 5636810d6f17 ([ARM] 3982/2: Explicitly select 32-bit ARM ISA (-marm))
> > > > back in 2006 when the minimal compiler version was already 3.3.
> > >
> > > According to gcc 3.3's --target-help, it supports -mthumb, but not -marm.
> > >
> > > What we could possibly do is to change the := to a plain =, and then
> > > evaluate all the options together via:
> > >
> > > KBUILD_CFLAGS :=$(KBUILD_CFLAGS)
> > You mean
> >
> > KBUILD_CFLAGS += $(arch-y)
> >
> > as soon as arch-y is defined to assert it's already present when -marm
> > is tested for, right? I will give that a try.
>
> I mean:
>
> else
> -CFLAGS_ISA :=$(call cc-option,-marm,)
> -AFLAGS_ISA :=$(CFLAGS_ISA)
> +CFLAGS_ISA =$(call cc-option,-marm,)
> +AFLAGS_ISA =$(CFLAGS_ISA)
> endif
> ...
> -KBUILD_CFLAGS +=$(CFLAGS_ABI) $(CFLAGS_ISA) $(arch-y) $(tune-y) $(call cc-option,-mshort-load-bytes,$(call cc-option,-malignment-traps,)) -msoft-float -Uarm
> -KBUILD_AFLAGS +=$(CFLAGS_ABI) $(AFLAGS_ISA) $(arch-y) $(tune-y) -include asm/unified.h -msoft-float
> +CFLAGS_TRAPS :=$(call cc-option,-mshort-load-bytes,$(call cc-option,-malignment-traps,))
> +
> +KBUILD_CFLAGS +=$(CFLAGS_ABI) $(arch-y) $(tune-y) $(CFLAGS_TRAPS) -msoft-float -Uarm
> +KBUILD_AFLAGS +=$(CFLAGS_ABI) $(arch-y) $(tune-y) -include asm/unified.h -msoft-float
>
> +# Ensures that all previous $(call ...) options are evaluated once
> +KBUILD_CFLAGS :=$(CFLAGS_ISA) $(KBUILD_CFLAGS)
> +KBUILD_AFLAGS :=$(CFLAGS_ISA) $(KBUILD_AFLAGS)
>
> This has the effect that "-marm" will be evaluated with all the other
> KBUILD_CFLAGS options already set. (I think I have this right...)
That should work too. It requires less code rearrangement than my
approach.
[...]
Cheers
---Dave
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-05-28 10:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-05-27 9:42 [PATCH RFC] ARM: use -marm unconditionally for THUMB2_KERNEL=n builds Uwe Kleine-König
2015-05-27 9:53 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-05-27 14:59 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2015-05-27 17:46 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-05-28 10:49 ` Dave Martin [this message]
2015-05-27 16:25 ` Nicolas Pitre
2015-05-28 10:48 ` Dave Martin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150528104923.GC3655@e103592.cambridge.arm.com \
--to=dave.martin@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox