From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: mturquette@linaro.org (Michael Turquette)
Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 18:07:33 -0700
Subject: [PATCH v8 6/7] clk: hi6220: Clock driver support for Hisilicon
 hi6220 SoC
In-Reply-To: <7h4mmwip62.fsf@deeprootsystems.com>
References: <1432440671-25235-1-git-send-email-bintian.wang@huawei.com>
 <1432440671-25235-3-git-send-email-bintian.wang@huawei.com>
 <20150528052608.22384.96747@quantum> <5566CF13.8060806@huawei.com>
 <7h4mmwip62.fsf@deeprootsystems.com>
Message-ID: <20150529010733.4469.33722@quantum>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

Quoting Kevin Hilman (2015-05-28 10:32:05)
> Bintian <bintian.wang@huawei.com> writes:
> 
> > Hello Mike,
> >
> > On 2015/5/28 13:26, Michael Turquette wrote:
> >> Quoting Bintian Wang (2015-05-23 21:11:11)
> >>> Add clock drivers for hi6220 SoC, this driver controls the SoC
> >>> registers to supply different clocks to different IPs in the SoC.
> >>>
> >>> We add one divider clock for hi6220 because the divider in hi6220
> >>> also has a mask bit but it doesnot obey the rule defined by flag
> >>> "CLK_DIVIDER_HIWORD_MASK", we can not get index of the mask bit by
> >>> left shift fixed bits (e.g. 16 bits), so we add this divider clock
> >>> to handle it.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz <jorge.ramirez-ortiz@linaro.org>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Bintian Wang <bintian.wang@huawei.com>
> >>> Acked-by: Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@linaro.org>
> >>> Reviewed-by: Zhangfei Gao <zhangfei.gao@linaro.org>
> >>> Tested-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
> >>> Tested-by: Tyler Baker <tyler.baker@linaro.org>
> >>
> >> Hi Bintian,
> >>
> >> Thanks for making the changes requested by Stephen. I've taken his patch
> >> to add assigned-clock-rate/parent support for AMBA interconnects and
> >> applied it to 4.1-rc1, and then I've applied your v8 patches #4-6 on top
> >> of that. You can find it at:
> >>
> >> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/clk/linux.git clk-next-hi6220
> > Thank you very much!
> >
> > I think you also need to pick patch "[PATCH v5 3/6] clk: hi6220:
> > Document devicetree bindings for hi6220 clock",  which described the
> > dt binding of clk, and it is also acked by Stephen(v4 is the same to
> > v5).
> >
> >> I have merged this into clk-next so it can get some cycles in
> >> linux-next.
> >>
> >> Stephen,
> >>
> >> Can you send your patch out to Russell properly? It needs his ack (or
> >> for him to take it outright) in order to unblock the hi6220 clock driver
> >> from being merged.
> > It doesn't block hi6220 clock driver now, because the UART1 is not
> > enabled in hi6220 dts now.
> 
> Now that the clk changes are queued up, can you (re)post the remaining
> hikey patches with a changelog stating the dependency on the clk-next
> branch.  I believe what's left is just the DT and Kconfig/defconfig
> changes, correct?

Just to be clear, clk-next-hi6220 is not an immutable branch. I just put
it up to get some testing done on it. Depending on whether or not
Russell acks Stephen's patch then it may be changed.

Regards,
Mike

> 
> With some acks from the DT maintainers, these should be ready to be
> merged through arm-soc.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Kevin