From: mark.rutland@arm.com (Mark Rutland)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/8] of/fdt: split off FDT self reservation from memreserve processing
Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2015 12:18:25 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150601111824.GC7443@leverpostej> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKv+Gu9+QZstC2i0Ks32_zb_S9dmj6vyEJOZEWjBvLoNWtOsPA@mail.gmail.com>
> > Do we have/need acks from Ben or Paul on this reservation patch?
> >
>
> Considering that this patch is essentially a partial revert of
> d1552ce449eb0 ("of/fdt: move memreserve and dtb memory reservations
> into core") by Rob, who acked this patch and submitted his patch
> without the acks of either Ben or Paul, and the fact that Ben and Paul
> (and Russell) have all been cc'ed at least 3 times on this patch, my
> take would be that it should be fine to go ahead without them. But it
> is ultimately up to Catalin, of course.
That sounds fine to me also, just thought I should check.
Mark.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-06-01 11:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-05-11 6:41 [PATCH 0/8] arm64 UEFI early FDT handling Ard Biesheuvel
2015-05-11 6:41 ` [PATCH 1/8] of/fdt: split off FDT self reservation from memreserve processing Ard Biesheuvel
2015-05-22 10:35 ` Catalin Marinas
2015-06-01 7:56 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2015-06-01 9:56 ` Mark Rutland
2015-06-01 10:46 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2015-06-01 11:02 ` Mark Rutland
2015-06-01 11:14 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2015-06-01 11:18 ` Mark Rutland [this message]
2015-05-11 6:41 ` [PATCH 2/8] arm64: use fixmap region for permanent FDT mapping Ard Biesheuvel
2015-06-01 9:53 ` Mark Rutland
2015-06-01 9:55 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2015-05-11 6:41 ` [PATCH 3/8] arm64: override early_init_dt_add_memory_arch() Ard Biesheuvel
2015-05-11 6:41 ` [PATCH 4/8] efi: move FDT handling to separate object file Ard Biesheuvel
2015-05-26 18:15 ` Matt Fleming
2015-05-11 6:41 ` [PATCH 5/8] arm64/efi: move EFI init before early FDT processing Ard Biesheuvel
2015-05-11 6:41 ` [PATCH 6/8] arm64/efi: ignore DT memory nodes instead of removing them Ard Biesheuvel
2015-05-11 16:28 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2015-05-12 14:31 ` Leif Lindholm
2015-05-12 15:01 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2015-05-11 6:41 ` [PATCH 7/8] arm64/efi: ignore DT memreserve entries " Ard Biesheuvel
2015-05-11 6:42 ` [PATCH 8/8] arm64/efi: adapt to relaxed FDT placement requirements Ard Biesheuvel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150601111824.GC7443@leverpostej \
--to=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox