From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: wsa@the-dreams.de (Wolfram Sang) Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2015 00:36:28 +0900 Subject: [PATCH v3 0/6] i2c: at91: add support to FIFOs and alternative command In-Reply-To: <20150602152647.GA2806@odux.rfo.atmel.com> References: <20150602152647.GA2806@odux.rfo.atmel.com> Message-ID: <20150602153622.GB2661@katana> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org > If you send a new version, could you add stable in Cc to patch 3/6: No need to send a new version just because of an additional ack. I can apply that. However... > Cc: stable at vger.kernel.org #3.10 and later > If not, Wolfram could you do it please? The problem with 3/6 is that it seems to depend on 1/6 which is a cleanup patch. If cleaning up is not essential for the bugfix, the latter should be done first. To avoid exactly this problem. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 819 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: