From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ludovic.desroches@atmel.com (Ludovic Desroches) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2015 17:52:22 +0200 Subject: [PATCH v3 0/6] i2c: at91: add support to FIFOs and alternative command In-Reply-To: <20150602153622.GB2661@katana> References: <20150602152647.GA2806@odux.rfo.atmel.com> <20150602153622.GB2661@katana> Message-ID: <20150602155222.GB2806@odux.rfo.atmel.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Wed, Jun 03, 2015 at 12:36:28AM +0900, Wolfram Sang wrote: > > > If you send a new version, could you add stable in Cc to patch 3/6: > > No need to send a new version just because of an additional ack. I can > apply that. However... > > > Cc: stable at vger.kernel.org #3.10 and later > > If not, Wolfram could you do it please? > > The problem with 3/6 is that it seems to depend on 1/6 which is a > cleanup patch. If cleaning up is not essential for the bugfix, the > latter should be done first. To avoid exactly this problem. > > I was thinking the same so I have tried to cherry-pick the patch on a 3.10.79 and it didn't cause any conflicts so I thought it could be sent to stable as is.