From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: thierry.reding@gmail.com (Thierry Reding) Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2015 13:39:51 +0200 Subject: [PATCH/RFC 1/2] ARM: multi_v7_defconfig: Make drm support modular In-Reply-To: <2568731.dqdEiMuDro@wuerfel> References: <1432905926-31606-1-git-send-email-geert@linux-m68k.org> <2568731.dqdEiMuDro@wuerfel> Message-ID: <20150605113949.GA26607@ulmo.nvidia.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 05:41:34PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Friday 29 May 2015 15:25:25 Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > From: Geert Uytterhoeven > > > > Make drm support modular to reduce kernel size (-620 KiB): > > > > text data bss dec hex filename > > 12211122 1392076 338520 13941718 d4bbd6 vmlinux.before > > 11581470 1387196 338264 13306930 cb0c32 vmlinux.after > > > > Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven > > --- > > Slightly controversial: > > - Does anyone need drm for boot testing? > > Only the tegra driver is affected, so let's ask the tegra > maintainers. As a matter of fact I do most of the DRM testing on boot using the built-in driver. However I can do that easily using tegra_defconfig so I'm fine with this change. Acked-by: Thierry Reding -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 819 bytes Desc: not available URL: