linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: lee.jones@linaro.org (Lee Jones)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 5/8] regulator: pwm-regulator: Don't assign structure attributes right away
Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2015 08:03:47 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150609070347.GE2982@x1> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150608180718.GR14071@sirena.org.uk>

On Mon, 08 Jun 2015, Mark Brown wrote:

> On Fri, Jun 05, 2015 at 07:42:48PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> > Perhaps this is just personal preference, but ...
> 
> Possibly...
> 
> > Prevents this kind of nonsense:
> 
> > 	this->is->just.silly = fetch_silly_value(&pointer);
> > 	if (!this->is->just.silly) {
> > 		printk("Silly value failed: %d\n", this->is->just.silly);
> > 		return this->is->just.silly;
> > 	}
> 
> But we don't have any of that code?  Well, one if statement where we
> check config.init_data but that's it.  A temporary does help with things
> like the above but we're not doing that in this driver are we?

Admittedly this is an extreme example, but I do consider:

	init_data = of_get_regulator_init_data(<blah>);
	if (init_data)
        	return -ENOMEM;

... neater than:

	config.init_data = of_get_regulator_init_data(<blah>);
	if (!config.init_data)
        	return -ENOMEM;

-- 
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org ? Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog

  reply	other threads:[~2015-06-09  7:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-06-05 18:42 [PATCH 0/8] regulator: pwm-regulator: Introduce continuous-mode Lee Jones
2015-06-05 18:42 ` [PATCH 1/8] ARM: STi: STiH407: Add PWM Regulator node Lee Jones
2015-06-05 18:42 ` [PATCH 2/8] regulator: pwm-regulator: Remove unnecessary descriptor attribute from ddata Lee Jones
2015-06-08 18:11   ` Mark Brown
2015-06-05 18:42 ` [PATCH 3/8] regulator: pwm-regulator: Remove superfluous is_enabled check Lee Jones
2015-06-08 18:11   ` Mark Brown
2015-06-05 18:42 ` [PATCH 4/8] regulator: pwm-regulator: Diffientiate between dev (device) and rdev (regulator_dev) Lee Jones
2015-06-08 18:11   ` Mark Brown
2015-06-05 18:42 ` [PATCH 5/8] regulator: pwm-regulator: Don't assign structure attributes right away Lee Jones
2015-06-08 18:07   ` Mark Brown
2015-06-09  7:03     ` Lee Jones [this message]
2015-06-09 10:10       ` Mark Brown
2015-06-09 11:07         ` Lee Jones
2015-06-05 18:42 ` [PATCH 6/8] regulator: pwm-regulator: Separate voltage-table initialisation Lee Jones
2015-06-09 17:14   ` Mark Brown
2015-06-10  7:58     ` Lee Jones
2015-06-05 18:42 ` [PATCH 7/8] regulator: pwm-regulator: Add support for continuous-voltage Lee Jones
2015-06-05 18:42 ` [PATCH 8/8] dt: regulator: pwm-regulator: Re-write bindings Lee Jones
2015-06-05 18:47   ` Lee Jones

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150609070347.GE2982@x1 \
    --to=lee.jones@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).