From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ludovic.desroches@atmel.com (Ludovic Desroches) Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2015 10:05:53 +0200 Subject: [PATCH v6 5/6] i2c: at91: print hardware version In-Reply-To: <5577428C.3090206@cogentembedded.com> References: <5577428C.3090206@cogentembedded.com> Message-ID: <20150610080553.GO25800@odux.rfo.atmel.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Tue, Jun 09, 2015 at 10:46:20PM +0300, Sergei Shtylyov wrote: > Hello. > > On 06/09/2015 07:22 PM, Cyrille Pitchen wrote: > > >The probe() function now prints the hardware version of the I2C > >controller. > > >Signed-off-by: Cyrille Pitchen > >--- > > drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-at91.c | 5 ++++- > > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > >diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-at91.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-at91.c > >index 817ae69..6e88b30 100644 > >--- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-at91.c > >+++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-at91.c > [...] > >@@ -908,7 +910,8 @@ static int at91_twi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > > return rc; > > } > > > >- dev_info(dev->dev, "AT91 i2c bus driver.\n"); > >+ dev_info(dev->dev, "AT91 i2c bus driver (version: %#x).\n", > > It looks as if you rather print the driver's version. :-) >>From my point of view, having a version number for a Linux driver would be strange so it's not confusing. > > >+ at91_twi_read(dev, AT91_TWI_VER)); > > return 0; > > } > > WBR, Sergei > Regards Ludovic