From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: mark.rutland@arm.com (Mark Rutland) Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2015 15:11:39 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 6/6] arm64: dts: juno: describe PMUs separately In-Reply-To: <20150611103144.GH12807@e106497-lin.cambridge.arm.com> References: <1432657876-1362-1-git-send-email-mark.rutland@arm.com> <1432657876-1362-7-git-send-email-mark.rutland@arm.com> <20150602104743.GI2175@e106497-lin.cambridge.arm.com> <20150610092536.GB1517@leverpostej> <20150611103144.GH12807@e106497-lin.cambridge.arm.com> Message-ID: <20150611141139.GA8848@leverpostej> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 11:31:44AM +0100, Liviu Dudau wrote: > On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 10:25:36AM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 02, 2015 at 11:47:43AM +0100, Liviu Dudau wrote: > > > On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 05:31:16PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote: > > > > The A57 and A53 PMUs in Juno support different events, so describe them > > > > separately. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland > > > > Cc: Liviu Dudau > > > > Cc: Will Deacon > > > > > > Hi Mark, > > > > > > Arnd has pulled my patches that add juno-r1.dts to the mix and he is going > > > to send a pull request for v4.2. Care to respin this patch to add support > > > for Juno R1 as well? > > > > Sure. Is there a branch out there with just the juno DT patch(es) in? > > Yes, git://linux-arm.org/linux-ld.git for-upstream/juno-dts Cheers! > > The DT patch only makes sense after the code changes, and those are > > currently based on Will's perf/updates branch (atop of v4.1-rc1), which > > doesn't have the DT changes. > > Not sure I parse what you meant here. My dts patch alone won't work with a current kernel (though a kernel with my perf patches will support existing and new DTBs). So my dts change shouldn't go through before the code change. I'd like to base the dts patch on a branch with both your existing dts changes and my perf code changes to ensure that. Thanks, Mark.