From: marc.zyngier@arm.com (Marc Zyngier)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] arm64/kvm: Add generic v8 KVM target
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2015 07:47:59 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150622074759.01d677a3@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <55847C1F.1090606@codeaurora.org>
On Fri, 19 Jun 2015 21:31:27 +0100
Timur Tabi <timur@codeaurora.org> wrote:
> On 06/17/2015 04:00 AM, Suzuki K. Poulose wrote:
> > &genericv8_target_table);
> > kvm_register_target_sys_reg_table(KVM_ARM_TARGET_XGENE_POTENZA,
> > &genericv8_target_table);
> > +
> > kvm_register_target_sys_reg_table(KVM_ARM_TARGET_GENERIC_V8,
> > + &genericv8_target_table);
> >
>
> Shouldn't you also remove all of the previous lines that return
> &genericv8_target_table?
No. KVM_ARM_TARGET_* are part of the uapi, and existing userspace knows
about them. You can't just drop them.
What you *could* do would be to map the existing targets to the generic
one in a way that leaves userspace blissfully unaware of the underlying
change (for example, KVM_ARM_PREFERRED_TARGET should still return
KVM_ARM_TARGET_XGENE_POTENZA on an XGene platform, and
KVM_ARM_VCPU_INIT should still be accept it).
What would be the gain of such a mapping? Added complexity, hardly
anything else. We're much better off considering the generic target as
a new one, both inside the kernel and in the view we export to
userspace.
Thanks,
M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-06-22 6:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-06-17 9:00 [PATCH] arm64/kvm: Add generic v8 KVM target Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-06-19 20:31 ` Timur Tabi
2015-06-22 6:47 ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
2015-06-22 8:44 ` Peter Maydell
2015-06-23 12:39 ` Christoffer Dall
2015-06-23 14:03 ` Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-06-23 14:16 ` Peter Maydell
2015-06-24 8:29 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-06-24 8:51 ` Christoffer Dall
2015-06-24 9:32 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-06-25 12:30 ` Christoffer Dall
2015-06-25 12:40 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-06-25 13:44 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-06-25 13:49 ` Peter Maydell
2015-06-26 9:53 ` Christoffer Dall
2015-06-29 17:13 ` Chalamarla, Tirumalesh
2015-06-29 17:30 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-06-29 17:38 ` Peter Maydell
2015-06-29 17:52 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-06-29 18:39 ` Chalamarla, Tirumalesh
[not found] ` <D805D093-CCFE-4835-853A-B2654DAA10A1@caviumnetworks.com>
2015-07-03 8:08 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-07-03 8:12 ` Peter Maydell
2015-07-03 8:28 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-07-03 9:34 ` Peter Maydell
2015-07-03 10:10 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-07-17 9:33 ` Christoffer Dall
2015-07-17 9:56 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-07-17 10:15 ` Christoffer Dall
2015-07-17 10:19 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-07-17 17:56 ` Chalamarla, Tirumalesh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150622074759.01d677a3@arm.com \
--to=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).