From: christoffer.dall@linaro.org (Christoffer Dall)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] arm64/kvm: Add generic v8 KVM target
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2015 14:39:59 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150623123959.GF4035@cbox> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFEAcA92uymQ3LjPQnuFiwvjSgc+jY54VrfK_Sh4v1DJ+=OPpw@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 09:44:48AM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 17 June 2015 at 10:00, Suzuki K. Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com> wrote:
> > From: "Suzuki K. Poulose" <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
> >
> > This patch adds a generic ARM v8 KVM target cpu type for use
> > by the new CPUs which eventualy ends up using the common sys_reg
> > table. For backward compatibility the existing targets have been
> > preserved. Any new target CPU that can be covered by generic v8
> > sys_reg tables should make use of the new generic target.
>
> How do you intend this to work for cross-host migration?
> Is the idea that the kernel guarantees that "generic" looks
> 100% the same to the guest regardless of host hardware? I'm
> not sure that can be made to work, given impdef differences
> in ID register values, bp/wp registers, and so on.
>
> Given that, it seems to me that we still need to provide
> KVM_ARM_TARGET_$THISCPU defines so userspace can request
> a specific guest CPU flavour; so what does this patch
> provide that isn't already provided by just having userspace
> query for the "preferred" CPU type as it does already?
>
I'm guessing the intention is to avoid having to add code in the kernel
to support KVM on a new CPU where nothing else needs to be done to
support KVM on that system.
Wrt. migration, I was also wondering about this. Would the differences
in the CPU architecture be detected when feeding back the invariant
sysregs from userspace on VM restore?
-Christoffer
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-06-23 12:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-06-17 9:00 [PATCH] arm64/kvm: Add generic v8 KVM target Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-06-19 20:31 ` Timur Tabi
2015-06-22 6:47 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-06-22 8:44 ` Peter Maydell
2015-06-23 12:39 ` Christoffer Dall [this message]
2015-06-23 14:03 ` Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-06-23 14:16 ` Peter Maydell
2015-06-24 8:29 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-06-24 8:51 ` Christoffer Dall
2015-06-24 9:32 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-06-25 12:30 ` Christoffer Dall
2015-06-25 12:40 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-06-25 13:44 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-06-25 13:49 ` Peter Maydell
2015-06-26 9:53 ` Christoffer Dall
2015-06-29 17:13 ` Chalamarla, Tirumalesh
2015-06-29 17:30 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-06-29 17:38 ` Peter Maydell
2015-06-29 17:52 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-06-29 18:39 ` Chalamarla, Tirumalesh
[not found] ` <D805D093-CCFE-4835-853A-B2654DAA10A1@caviumnetworks.com>
2015-07-03 8:08 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-07-03 8:12 ` Peter Maydell
2015-07-03 8:28 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-07-03 9:34 ` Peter Maydell
2015-07-03 10:10 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-07-17 9:33 ` Christoffer Dall
2015-07-17 9:56 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-07-17 10:15 ` Christoffer Dall
2015-07-17 10:19 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-07-17 17:56 ` Chalamarla, Tirumalesh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150623123959.GF4035@cbox \
--to=christoffer.dall@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).