From: linux@arm.linux.org.uk (Russell King - ARM Linux)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH v3] arm DMA: Fix allocation from CMA for coherent DMA
Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2015 11:46:04 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150629104604.GB7557@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150629103737.GC29907@e104818-lin.cambridge.arm.com>
On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 11:37:37AM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> I forgot about the arm_dma_mmap fix here:
>
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/5/7/512
>
> So we either fix both cases by changing __get_dma_pgprot() or just go
> for Mike's and your patches as above. It's up to Russell.
I'd prefer the "least code" option. :)
> At some point, we could do with some more clean-up in the dma-mapping.c.
> For example, both __alloc_simple_buffer() and __alloc_from_contiguous()
> end up calling __dma_clear_buffer() even when not necessary (cacheable
> mapping). Not too bad though as this is only done when setting up the
> buffer.
The reason we always clear the buffer is that we can't be sure that a
driver will not map a buffer allocated by dma_alloc_coherent() into
userspace without it first being initialised. There have been drivers
which do this (ALSA in particular.) I haven't checked whether this
instance still does this, but it used to - and the problem is once
one instance exists, it gets copied...
If it isn't initialised, userspace gets access to whatever data was in
that page prior to the allocation, which could be something like your
root password, or bank details, some other sensitive data.
So, removing the clearing probably opens a rather large security hole.
--
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 10.5Mbps down 400kbps up
according to speedtest.net.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-06-29 10:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-06-18 21:44 [RFC PATCH v3] arm DMA: Fix allocation from CMA for coherent DMA Lorenzo Nava
2015-06-26 16:25 ` Catalin Marinas
2015-06-28 20:14 ` Lorenzo Nava
2015-06-29 10:37 ` Catalin Marinas
2015-06-29 10:46 ` Russell King - ARM Linux [this message]
2015-06-29 11:05 ` Catalin Marinas
2015-06-29 11:30 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150629104604.GB7557@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk \
--to=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).