From: will.deacon@arm.com (Will Deacon)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] ARM64: TTY: hvc_dcc: Add support for ARM64 dcc
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2015 14:51:54 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150630135153.GJ27725@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <558B0EEC.9040504@codeaurora.org>
On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 09:11:24PM +0100, Timur Tabi wrote:
> On 06/22/2015 08:12 AM, Will Deacon wrote:
> > I still think we should be disabling userspace access to the DCC if the
> > kernel is using it as its console.
>
> I still need help with this. I know you said a year ago that
> MDSCR_EL1.TDCC needs to be set to disable userspace access. Where and
> how should I do this? I can do this:
Well, it's up to you to figure out the details, but I'd start by adding
some static inlines to the arch-specific header files for enabling/disabling
userspace access.
>From there, I think I'd get the architecture init code to reset the thing
to "disabled" (so it's disabled regardless of whether we build the hvc_dcc
driver) and then if you wanted to go all-out, we could have a sysfs entry
provided by the driver to toggle it on and off.
> static int __init hvc_dcc_console_init(void)
> {
> #ifdef CONFIG_ARM64
> u32 val;
>
> asm("msr mdscr_el1, %0 "
> "orr %0, %0, #4096 " /* TDCC */
> "msr %0, mdscr_el1 "
> : "=r" (val));
> #endif
>
> But this seems clunky.
Yeah, that's super ugly.
> I am concerned about KVM, though. There appears to be code in KVM in
> hyp.s and sys_regs.c that touches and/or emulates MDSCR_EL1.
>
> On a side note, it does not appear that ARM32 blocks userspace DCC. I
> don't see where DBGDSCR.UDCCdis is set.
That's a bug imo.
Will
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-06-30 13:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-06-19 22:08 [PATCH] ARM64: TTY: hvc_dcc: Add support for ARM64 dcc Timur Tabi
2015-06-22 13:12 ` Will Deacon
2015-06-22 13:16 ` Timur Tabi
2015-06-24 20:11 ` Timur Tabi
2015-06-30 13:51 ` Will Deacon [this message]
2015-06-30 13:58 ` Timur Tabi
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2014-06-16 22:29 Abhimanyu Kapur
2014-06-17 9:51 ` Will Deacon
2015-06-05 18:35 ` Timur Tabi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150630135153.GJ27725@arm.com \
--to=will.deacon@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).