linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: christoffer.dall@linaro.org (Christoffer Dall)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 04/11] KVM: arm: common infrastructure for handling AArch32 CP14/CP15
Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2015 11:00:36 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150701090036.GE11332@cbox> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <67A0000D-7F97-49E2-94A1-A6C89E45AA97@linaro.org>

On Wed, Jul 01, 2015 at 03:09:35PM +0800, zichao wrote:
> 
> 
> On June 30, 2015 3:43:34 AM GMT+08:00, Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org> wrote:
> >On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 06:41:27PM +0800, Zhichao Huang wrote:
> >> As we're about to trap a bunch of CP14 registers, let's rework
> >> the CP15 handling so it can be generalized and work with multiple
> >> tables.
> >> 
> >> Signed-off-by: Zhichao Huang <zhichao.huang@linaro.org>
> >> ---
> >>  arch/arm/kvm/coproc.c          | 176
> >++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
> >>  arch/arm/kvm/interrupts_head.S |   2 +-
> >>  2 files changed, 112 insertions(+), 66 deletions(-)
> >> 
> >> diff --git a/arch/arm/kvm/coproc.c b/arch/arm/kvm/coproc.c
> >> index 9d283d9..d23395b 100644
> >> --- a/arch/arm/kvm/coproc.c
> >> +++ b/arch/arm/kvm/coproc.c
> >> @@ -375,6 +375,9 @@ static const struct coproc_reg cp15_regs[] = {
> >>  	{ CRn(15), CRm( 0), Op1( 4), Op2( 0), is32, access_cbar},
> >>  };
> >>  
> >> +static const struct coproc_reg cp14_regs[] = {
> >> +};
> >> +
> >>  /* Target specific emulation tables */
> >>  static struct kvm_coproc_target_table
> >*target_tables[KVM_ARM_NUM_TARGETS];
> >>  
> >> @@ -424,47 +427,75 @@ static const struct coproc_reg *find_reg(const
> >struct coproc_params *params,
> >>  	return NULL;
> >>  }
> >>  
> >> -static int emulate_cp15(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> >> -			const struct coproc_params *params)
> >> +/*
> >> + * emulate_cp --  tries to match a cp14/cp15 access in a handling
> >table,
> >> + *                and call the corresponding trap handler.
> >> + *
> >> + * @params: pointer to the descriptor of the access
> >> + * @table: array of trap descriptors
> >> + * @num: size of the trap descriptor array
> >> + *
> >> + * Return 0 if the access has been handled, and -1 if not.
> >> + */
> >> +static int emulate_cp(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> >> +			const struct coproc_params *params,
> >> +			const struct coproc_reg *table,
> >> +			size_t num)
> >>  {
> >> -	size_t num;
> >> -	const struct coproc_reg *table, *r;
> >> -
> >> -	trace_kvm_emulate_cp15_imp(params->Op1, params->Rt1, params->CRn,
> >> -				   params->CRm, params->Op2, params->is_write);
> >> +	const struct coproc_reg *r;
> >>  
> >> -	table = get_target_table(vcpu->arch.target, &num);
> >> +	if (!table)
> >> +		return -1;	/* Not handled */
> >>  
> >> -	/* Search target-specific then generic table. */
> >>  	r = find_reg(params, table, num);
> >> -	if (!r)
> >> -		r = find_reg(params, cp15_regs, ARRAY_SIZE(cp15_regs));
> >>  
> >> -	if (likely(r)) {
> >> +	if (r) {
> >>  		/* If we don't have an accessor, we should never get here! */
> >>  		BUG_ON(!r->access);
> >>  
> >>  		if (likely(r->access(vcpu, params, r))) {
> >>  			/* Skip instruction, since it was emulated */
> >>  			kvm_skip_instr(vcpu, kvm_vcpu_trap_il_is32bit(vcpu));
> >> -			return 1;
> >>  		}
> >> -		/* If access function fails, it should complain. */
> >> -	} else {
> >> -		kvm_err("Unsupported guest CP15 access at: %08lx\n",
> >> -			*vcpu_pc(vcpu));
> >> -		print_cp_instr(params);
> >> +
> >> +		/* Handled */
> >> +		return 0;
> >>  	}
> >> +
> >> +	/* Not handled */
> >> +	return -1;
> >> +}
> >> +
> >> +static void unhandled_cp_access(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> >> +				const struct coproc_params *params)
> >> +{
> >> +	u8 hsr_ec = kvm_vcpu_trap_get_class(vcpu);
> >> +	int cp;
> >> +
> >> +	switch (hsr_ec) {
> >> +	case HSR_EC_CP15_32:
> >> +	case HSR_EC_CP15_64:
> >> +		cp = 15;
> >> +		break;
> >> +	case HSR_EC_CP14_MR:
> >> +	case HSR_EC_CP14_64:
> >> +		cp = 14;
> >> +		break;
> >> +	default:
> >> +		WARN_ON((cp = -1));
> >> +	}
> >> +
> >> +	kvm_err("Unsupported guest CP%d access at: %08lx\n",
> >> +		cp, *vcpu_pc(vcpu));
> >> +	print_cp_instr(params);
> >>  	kvm_inject_undefined(vcpu);
> >> -	return 1;
> >>  }
> >>  
> >> -/**
> >> - * kvm_handle_cp15_64 -- handles a mrrc/mcrr trap on a guest CP15
> >access
> >> - * @vcpu: The VCPU pointer
> >> - * @run:  The kvm_run struct
> >> - */
> >> -int kvm_handle_cp15_64(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run)
> >> +int kvm_handle_cp_64(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> >> +			const struct coproc_reg *global,
> >> +			size_t nr_global,
> >> +			const struct coproc_reg *target_specific,
> >> +			size_t nr_specific)
> >>  {
> >>  	struct coproc_params params;
> >>  
> >> @@ -478,7 +509,13 @@ int kvm_handle_cp15_64(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> >struct kvm_run *run)
> >>  	params.Rt2 = (kvm_vcpu_get_hsr(vcpu) >> 10) & 0xf;
> >>  	params.CRm = 0;
> >>  
> >> -	return emulate_cp15(vcpu, &params);
> >> +	if (!emulate_cp(vcpu, &params, target_specific, nr_specific))
> >> +		return 1;
> >> +	if (!emulate_cp(vcpu, &params, global, nr_global))
> >> +		return 1;
> >> +
> >> +	unhandled_cp_access(vcpu, &params);
> >> +	return 1;
> >>  }
> >>  
> >>  static void reset_coproc_regs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> >> @@ -491,12 +528,11 @@ static void reset_coproc_regs(struct kvm_vcpu
> >*vcpu,
> >>  			table[i].reset(vcpu, &table[i]);
> >>  }
> >>  
> >> -/**
> >> - * kvm_handle_cp15_32 -- handles a mrc/mcr trap on a guest CP15
> >access
> >> - * @vcpu: The VCPU pointer
> >> - * @run:  The kvm_run struct
> >> - */
> >> -int kvm_handle_cp15_32(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run)
> >> +int kvm_handle_cp_32(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> >> +			const struct coproc_reg *global,
> >> +			size_t nr_global,
> >> +			const struct coproc_reg *target_specific,
> >> +			size_t nr_specific)
> >>  {
> >>  	struct coproc_params params;
> >>  
> >> @@ -510,33 +546,57 @@ int kvm_handle_cp15_32(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> >struct kvm_run *run)
> >>  	params.Op2 = (kvm_vcpu_get_hsr(vcpu) >> 17) & 0x7;
> >>  	params.Rt2 = 0;
> >>  
> >> -	return emulate_cp15(vcpu, &params);
> >> +	if (!emulate_cp(vcpu, &params, target_specific, nr_specific))
> >> +		return 1;
> >> +	if (!emulate_cp(vcpu, &params, global, nr_global))
> >> +		return 1;
> >> +
> >> +	unhandled_cp_access(vcpu, &params);
> >> +	return 1;
> >>  }
> >>  
> >>  /**
> >> - * kvm_handle_cp14_64 -- handles a mrrc/mcrr trap on a guest CP14
> >access
> >> + * kvm_handle_cp15_64 -- handles a mrrc/mcrr trap on a guest CP15
> >access
> >>   * @vcpu: The VCPU pointer
> >>   * @run:  The kvm_run struct
> >>   */
> >> -int kvm_handle_cp14_64(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run)
> >> +int kvm_handle_cp15_64(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run)
> >>  {
> >> -	struct coproc_params params;
> >> +	const struct coproc_reg *target_specific;
> >> +	size_t num;
> >>  
> >> -	params.CRn = (kvm_vcpu_get_hsr(vcpu) >> 1) & 0xf;
> >> -	params.Rt1 = (kvm_vcpu_get_hsr(vcpu) >> 5) & 0xf;
> >> -	params.is_write = ((kvm_vcpu_get_hsr(vcpu) & 1) == 0);
> >> -	params.is_64bit = true;
> >> +	target_specific = get_target_table(vcpu->arch.target, &num);
> >> +	return kvm_handle_cp_64(vcpu,
> >> +				cp15_regs, ARRAY_SIZE(cp15_regs),
> >> +				target_specific, num);
> >> +}
> >>  
> >> -	params.Op1 = (kvm_vcpu_get_hsr(vcpu) >> 16) & 0xf;
> >> -	params.Op2 = 0;
> >> -	params.Rt2 = (kvm_vcpu_get_hsr(vcpu) >> 10) & 0xf;
> >> -	params.CRm = 0;
> >> +/**
> >> + * kvm_handle_cp15_32 -- handles a mrc/mcr trap on a guest CP15
> >access
> >> + * @vcpu: The VCPU pointer
> >> + * @run:  The kvm_run struct
> >> + */
> >> +int kvm_handle_cp15_32(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run)
> >> +{
> >> +	const struct coproc_reg *target_specific;
> >> +	size_t num;
> >>  
> >> -	(void)trap_raz_wi(vcpu, &params, NULL);
> >> +	target_specific = get_target_table(vcpu->arch.target, &num);
> >> +	return kvm_handle_cp_32(vcpu,
> >> +				cp15_regs, ARRAY_SIZE(cp15_regs),
> >> +				target_specific, num);
> >> +}
> >>  
> >> -	/* handled */
> >> -	kvm_skip_instr(vcpu, kvm_vcpu_trap_il_is32bit(vcpu));
> >> -	return 1;
> >> +/**
> >> + * kvm_handle_cp14_64 -- handles a mrrc/mcrr trap on a guest CP14
> >access
> >> + * @vcpu: The VCPU pointer
> >> + * @run:  The kvm_run struct
> >> + */
> >> +int kvm_handle_cp14_64(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run)
> >> +{
> >> +	return kvm_handle_cp_64(vcpu,
> >> +				cp14_regs, ARRAY_SIZE(cp14_regs),
> >> +				NULL, 0);
> >>  }
> >>  
> >>  /**
> >> @@ -546,23 +606,9 @@ int kvm_handle_cp14_64(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> >struct kvm_run *run)
> >>   */
> >>  int kvm_handle_cp14_32(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run)
> >>  {
> >> -	struct coproc_params params;
> >> -
> >> -	params.CRm = (kvm_vcpu_get_hsr(vcpu) >> 1) & 0xf;
> >> -	params.Rt1 = (kvm_vcpu_get_hsr(vcpu) >> 5) & 0xf;
> >> -	params.is_write = ((kvm_vcpu_get_hsr(vcpu) & 1) == 0);
> >> -	params.is_64bit = false;
> >> -
> >> -	params.CRn = (kvm_vcpu_get_hsr(vcpu) >> 10) & 0xf;
> >> -	params.Op1 = (kvm_vcpu_get_hsr(vcpu) >> 14) & 0x7;
> >> -	params.Op2 = (kvm_vcpu_get_hsr(vcpu) >> 17) & 0x7;
> >> -	params.Rt2 = 0;
> >> -
> >> -	(void)trap_raz_wi(vcpu, &params, NULL);
> >> -
> >> -	/* handled */
> >> -	kvm_skip_instr(vcpu, kvm_vcpu_trap_il_is32bit(vcpu));
> >> -	return 1;
> >> +	return kvm_handle_cp_32(vcpu,
> >> +				cp14_regs, ARRAY_SIZE(cp14_regs),
> >> +				NULL, 0);
> >>  }
> >>  
> >> 
> >/******************************************************************************
> >> diff --git a/arch/arm/kvm/interrupts_head.S
> >b/arch/arm/kvm/interrupts_head.S
> >> index f85c447..a20b9ad 100644
> >> --- a/arch/arm/kvm/interrupts_head.S
> >> +++ b/arch/arm/kvm/interrupts_head.S
> >> @@ -618,7 +618,7 @@ ARM_BE8(rev	r6, r6  )
> >>   * (hardware reset value is 0) */
> >>  .macro set_hdcr operation
> >>  	mrc	p15, 4, r2, c1, c1, 1
> >> -	ldr	r3, =(HDCR_TPM|HDCR_TPMCR|HDCR_TDRA|HDCR_TDOSA|HDCR_TDA)
> >> +	ldr	r3, =(HDCR_TPM|HDCR_TPMCR)
> >
> >why do we stop trapping accesses here?
> 
> Because we didn't finish our trap handlers yet, if we keep the trapping enable here, the vm would not run normally as we use unhandled_cp_access in the trap handlers instead of trap_raz_wi.
> 
> I enable trapping until everything is ok, in the last patch [11/11].
> 
ok, I see.  Feels a bit quirky, but ok.

-Christoffer

  reply	other threads:[~2015-07-01  9:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-06-22 10:41 [PATCH v3 00/11] KVM: arm: debug infrastructure support Zhichao Huang
2015-06-22 10:41 ` [PATCH v3 01/11] KVM: arm: plug guest debug exploit Zhichao Huang
2015-06-29 15:49   ` Christoffer Dall
2015-07-01  7:04     ` zichao
2015-07-01  9:00       ` Christoffer Dall
2015-06-22 10:41 ` [PATCH v3 02/11] KVM: arm: rename pm_fake handler to trap_raz_wi Zhichao Huang
2015-06-30 13:20   ` Christoffer Dall
2015-06-22 10:41 ` [PATCH v3 03/11] KVM: arm: enable to use the ARM_DSCR_MDBGEN macro from KVM assembly code Zhichao Huang
2015-06-30 13:20   ` Christoffer Dall
2015-06-22 10:41 ` [PATCH v3 04/11] KVM: arm: common infrastructure for handling AArch32 CP14/CP15 Zhichao Huang
2015-06-29 19:43   ` Christoffer Dall
2015-07-01  7:09     ` zichao
2015-07-01  9:00       ` Christoffer Dall [this message]
2015-06-22 10:41 ` [PATCH v3 05/11] KVM: arm: check ordering of all system register tables Zhichao Huang
2015-06-30 13:20   ` Christoffer Dall
2015-06-22 10:41 ` [PATCH v3 06/11] KVM: arm: add trap handlers for 32-bit debug registers Zhichao Huang
2015-06-29 21:16   ` Christoffer Dall
2015-07-01  7:14     ` zichao
2015-06-22 10:41 ` [PATCH v3 07/11] KVM: arm: add trap handlers for 64-bit " Zhichao Huang
2015-06-30 13:20   ` Christoffer Dall
2015-07-01  7:43     ` Zhichao Huang
2015-06-22 10:41 ` [PATCH v3 08/11] KVM: arm: implement dirty bit mechanism for " Zhichao Huang
2015-06-30  9:20   ` Christoffer Dall
2015-07-03  9:54     ` Zhichao Huang
2015-07-03 11:56       ` Christoffer Dall
2015-07-07 10:06         ` Zhichao Huang
2015-07-07 10:24           ` Will Deacon
2015-07-08 10:50             ` Zhichao Huang
2015-07-08 17:08               ` Will Deacon
2015-07-09 12:54                 ` Zhichao Huang
2015-07-09 11:50             ` Christoffer Dall
2015-07-13 12:12               ` zichao
2015-06-22 10:41 ` [PATCH v3 09/11] KVM: arm: implement lazy world switch " Zhichao Huang
2015-06-30 13:15   ` Christoffer Dall
2015-07-03 10:06     ` Zhichao Huang
2015-07-03 21:05       ` Christoffer Dall
2015-06-22 10:41 ` [PATCH v3 10/11] KVM: arm: add a trace event for cp14 traps Zhichao Huang
2015-06-30 13:20   ` Christoffer Dall
2015-06-22 10:41 ` [PATCH v3 11/11] KVM: arm: enable trapping of all debug registers Zhichao Huang
2015-06-30 13:19   ` Christoffer Dall

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150701090036.GE11332@cbox \
    --to=christoffer.dall@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).