From: viresh.kumar@linaro.org (Viresh Kumar)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 03/10] OPP: Allocate dev_opp from _add_device_opp()
Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2015 12:15:54 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150703064554.GB4564@linux> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5595CD68.9040701@codeaurora.org>
On 02-07-15, 16:46, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Looking better.
And does this look perfect ? :)
------------------8<----------------
Message-Id: <7c23b93b6b328e0b14b5c5096c3c3322e3d8ee4b.1435905782.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2015 12:43:14 +0530
Subject: [PATCH] OPP: Allocate dev_opp from _add_device_opp()
There is no need to complicate _opp_add_dynamic() with allocation of
dev_opp as well. Allocate it from _add_device_opp() instead.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
---
drivers/base/power/opp.c | 60 +++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------------
1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/base/power/opp.c b/drivers/base/power/opp.c
index 7895fdd64192..5869a8524244 100644
--- a/drivers/base/power/opp.c
+++ b/drivers/base/power/opp.c
@@ -408,11 +408,11 @@ struct dev_pm_opp *dev_pm_opp_find_freq_floor(struct device *dev,
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dev_pm_opp_find_freq_floor);
/**
- * _add_device_opp() - Allocate a new device OPP table
+ * _add_device_opp() - Find device OPP table or allocate a new one
* @dev: device for which we do this operation
*
- * New device node which uses OPPs - used when multiple devices with OPP tables
- * are maintained.
+ * It tries to find an existing table first, if it couldn't find one, it
+ * allocates a new OPP table and returns that.
*
* Return: valid device_opp pointer if success, else NULL.
*/
@@ -420,6 +420,11 @@ static struct device_opp *_add_device_opp(struct device *dev)
{
struct device_opp *dev_opp;
+ /* Check for existing list for 'dev' first */
+ dev_opp = _find_device_opp(dev);
+ if (!IS_ERR(dev_opp))
+ return dev_opp;
+
/*
* Allocate a new device OPP table. In the infrequent case where a new
* device is needed to be added, we pay this penalty.
@@ -575,7 +580,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dev_pm_opp_remove);
static int _opp_add_dynamic(struct device *dev, unsigned long freq,
long u_volt, bool dynamic)
{
- struct device_opp *dev_opp = NULL;
+ struct device_opp *dev_opp;
struct dev_pm_opp *opp, *new_opp;
struct list_head *head;
int ret;
@@ -592,19 +597,11 @@ static int _opp_add_dynamic(struct device *dev, unsigned long freq,
new_opp->rate = freq;
new_opp->u_volt = u_volt;
new_opp->available = true;
- new_opp->dynamic = dynamic;
-
- /* Check for existing list for 'dev' */
- dev_opp = _find_device_opp(dev);
- if (IS_ERR(dev_opp)) {
- dev_opp = _add_device_opp(dev);
- if (!dev_opp) {
- ret = -ENOMEM;
- goto free_opp;
- }
- head = &dev_opp->opp_list;
- goto list_add;
+ dev_opp = _add_device_opp(dev);
+ if (!dev_opp) {
+ ret = -ENOMEM;
+ goto free_opp;
}
/*
@@ -613,24 +610,25 @@ static int _opp_add_dynamic(struct device *dev, unsigned long freq,
*/
head = &dev_opp->opp_list;
list_for_each_entry_rcu(opp, &dev_opp->opp_list, node) {
- if (new_opp->rate <= opp->rate)
- break;
- else
+ if (new_opp->rate > opp->rate) {
head = &opp->node;
+ } else if (new_opp->rate < opp->rate) {
+ break;
+ } else {
+ /* Duplicate OPPs */
+ ret = opp->available && new_opp->u_volt == opp->u_volt ?
+ 0 : -EEXIST;
+
+ dev_warn(dev,
+ "%s: duplicate OPPs detected. Existing: freq: %lu, volt: %lu, enabled: %d. New: freq: %lu, volt: %lu, enabled: %d\n",
+ __func__, opp->rate, opp->u_volt,
+ opp->available, new_opp->rate, new_opp->u_volt,
+ new_opp->available);
+ goto free_opp;
+ }
}
- /* Duplicate OPPs ? */
- if (new_opp->rate == opp->rate) {
- ret = opp->available && new_opp->u_volt == opp->u_volt ?
- 0 : -EEXIST;
-
- dev_warn(dev, "%s: duplicate OPPs detected. Existing: freq: %lu, volt: %lu, enabled: %d. New: freq: %lu, volt: %lu, enabled: %d\n",
- __func__, opp->rate, opp->u_volt, opp->available,
- new_opp->rate, new_opp->u_volt, new_opp->available);
- goto free_opp;
- }
-
-list_add:
+ new_opp->dynamic = dynamic;
new_opp->dev_opp = dev_opp;
list_add_rcu(&new_opp->node, head);
mutex_unlock(&dev_opp_list_lock);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-07-03 6:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-06-15 11:57 [PATCH 00/10] OPP: Add code to support operating-points-v2 bindings Viresh Kumar
2015-06-15 11:57 ` [PATCH 01/10] opp: Relocate few routines Viresh Kumar
2015-07-02 1:25 ` Stephen Boyd
2015-07-24 17:08 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2015-06-15 11:57 ` [PATCH 02/10] OPP: Create _remove_device_opp() for freeing dev_opp Viresh Kumar
2015-07-02 1:25 ` Stephen Boyd
2015-07-24 17:13 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2015-06-15 11:57 ` [PATCH 03/10] OPP: Allocate dev_opp from _add_device_opp() Viresh Kumar
2015-07-02 1:02 ` Stephen Boyd
2015-07-02 6:24 ` Viresh Kumar
2015-07-02 23:46 ` Stephen Boyd
2015-07-03 6:45 ` Viresh Kumar [this message]
2015-07-06 22:31 ` Stephen Boyd
2015-07-24 17:25 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2015-06-15 11:57 ` [PATCH 04/10] OPP: Break _opp_add_dynamic() into smaller functions Viresh Kumar
2015-07-24 17:42 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2015-06-15 11:57 ` [PATCH 05/10] opp: Add support to parse "operating-points-v2" bindings Viresh Kumar
2015-07-02 1:13 ` Stephen Boyd
2015-07-02 6:38 ` Viresh Kumar
2015-07-02 16:07 ` Stephen Boyd
2015-07-03 6:08 ` Viresh Kumar
2015-07-08 13:41 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2015-07-09 5:18 ` Viresh Kumar
2015-07-24 18:02 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2015-07-27 3:14 ` Viresh Kumar
2015-07-27 3:02 ` Viresh Kumar
2015-07-28 23:03 ` Stephen Boyd
2015-07-29 6:53 ` Viresh Kumar
2015-07-30 10:17 ` Viresh Kumar
2015-06-15 11:57 ` [PATCH 06/10] OPP: Add clock-latency-ns support Viresh Kumar
2015-07-02 1:27 ` Stephen Boyd
2015-06-15 11:57 ` [PATCH 07/10] opp: Add OPP sharing information to OPP library Viresh Kumar
2015-07-17 22:51 ` Stephen Boyd
2015-07-18 6:33 ` Viresh Kumar
2015-07-20 17:46 ` Stephen Boyd
2015-07-21 2:18 ` Viresh Kumar
2015-07-27 3:20 ` Viresh Kumar
2015-06-15 11:57 ` [PATCH 08/10] OPP: Add support for opp-suspend Viresh Kumar
2015-07-17 19:22 ` Stephen Boyd
2015-07-18 6:32 ` Viresh Kumar
2015-06-15 11:57 ` [PATCH 09/10] opp: Add helpers for initializing CPU OPPs Viresh Kumar
2015-06-15 11:57 ` [PATCH 10/10] cpufreq-dt: Add support for operating-points-v2 bindings Viresh Kumar
2015-07-09 16:13 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2015-07-09 16:44 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2015-07-15 2:59 ` Viresh Kumar
2015-06-30 16:44 ` [PATCH 00/10] OPP: Add code to support " Viresh Kumar
2015-07-17 2:36 ` Viresh Kumar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150703064554.GB4564@linux \
--to=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).