From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: shawnguo@kernel.org (Shawn Guo) Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2015 17:00:04 +0800 Subject: [PATCH 2/6] mmc: sdhci-esdhc-imx: add tuning-step seting support In-Reply-To: References: <1433926244-29244-1-git-send-email-haibo.chen@freescale.com> <1433926244-29244-3-git-send-email-haibo.chen@freescale.com> <20150703111017.GA17553@localhost> Message-ID: <20150708090004.GB28488@tiger> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Mon, Jul 06, 2015 at 03:05:47AM +0000, Chen Bough wrote: > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Shawn Guo [mailto:shawnguo at kernel.org] > > Sent: Friday, July 03, 2015 7:10 PM > > To: Chen Haibo-B51421 > > Cc: linux-mmc at vger.kernel.org; Dong Aisheng-B29396; > > ulf.hansson at linaro.org; chris at printf.net; shawn.guo at linaro.org; linux- > > arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org > > Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] mmc: sdhci-esdhc-imx: add tuning-step seting > > support > > > > On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 04:50:40PM +0800, Haibo Chen wrote: > > > @@ -969,6 +976,8 @@ sdhci_esdhc_imx_probe_dt(struct platform_device > > *pdev, > > > > > > of_property_read_u32(np, "max-frequency", &boarddata->f_max); > > > > > > + of_property_read_u32(np, "tuning-step", &boarddata->tuning_step); > > > + > > > > Where is the binding doc for this device tree property? > > > > Shawn > > I will add this in next version, Thanks for your review. If this is a vendor specific property rather than generic one, do not forget to have a vendor prefix for the property, i.e. "fsl,tuning-step". Shawn