* [RFC PATCH 0/3] arm: psci: implement cpuidle_ops
@ 2015-07-04 13:01 Jisheng Zhang
2015-07-04 13:01 ` [RFC PATCH 1/3] arm: psci: rename psci_smp.c to psci.c Jisheng Zhang
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Jisheng Zhang @ 2015-07-04 13:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
We'd like to use cpuidle-arm.c for both arm and arm64 with psci as backend.
For arm64, it works. But for arm, we miss cpuidle_ops, these patches try to
address this issue.
Has been tested on Marvell Berlin SoCs. These patches are rebased on the Mark
Rutland's latest psci unification work.
[PATCH 1/3] renames psci_smp.c to psci.c to prepare for the next two changes.
[PATCH 2/3] enables PSCI on UP systems so that some calls like cpu_suspend can
be made functional on UP too
[PATCH 3/3] add the cpuidle_ops for psci. Most code is stolen from arm64, which
introduce duplicated psci code, that's why it's marked as "RFC", I dunno where
to put cpu_psci_cpu_init_idle() related functions.
Comments are welcome!
Jisheng Zhang (3):
arm: psci: rename psci_smp.c to psci.c
arm: psci: enable PSCI on UP systems
arm: psci: add cpuidle_ops support
arch/arm/kernel/Makefile | 5 +-
arch/arm/kernel/psci.c | 248 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
arch/arm/kernel/psci_smp.c | 130 ------------------------
3 files changed, 249 insertions(+), 134 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 arch/arm/kernel/psci.c
delete mode 100644 arch/arm/kernel/psci_smp.c
--
2.1.4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* [RFC PATCH 1/3] arm: psci: rename psci_smp.c to psci.c 2015-07-04 13:01 [RFC PATCH 0/3] arm: psci: implement cpuidle_ops Jisheng Zhang @ 2015-07-04 13:01 ` Jisheng Zhang 2015-07-06 9:06 ` Daniel Lezcano 2015-07-04 13:01 ` [RFC PATCH 2/3] arm: psci: enable PSCI on UP systems Jisheng Zhang 2015-07-04 13:01 ` [RFC PATCH 3/3] arm: psci: add cpuidle_ops support Jisheng Zhang 2 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread From: Jisheng Zhang @ 2015-07-04 13:01 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-arm-kernel This will prepare for next commit to enable PSCI for UP systems so that calls like cpu_suspend can be made functional on UP too. Signed-off-by: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@marvell.com> --- arch/arm/kernel/Makefile | 2 +- arch/arm/kernel/psci.c | 130 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ arch/arm/kernel/psci_smp.c | 130 --------------------------------------------- 3 files changed, 131 insertions(+), 131 deletions(-) create mode 100644 arch/arm/kernel/psci.c delete mode 100644 arch/arm/kernel/psci_smp.c diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/Makefile b/arch/arm/kernel/Makefile index 3b995f5..c57b2c0 100644 --- a/arch/arm/kernel/Makefile +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/Makefile @@ -90,7 +90,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_EARLY_PRINTK) += early_printk.o obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_VIRT_EXT) += hyp-stub.o ifeq ($(CONFIG_ARM_PSCI),y) obj-y += psci-call.o -obj-$(CONFIG_SMP) += psci_smp.o +obj-$(CONFIG_SMP) += psci.o endif extra-y := $(head-y) vmlinux.lds diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/psci.c b/arch/arm/kernel/psci.c new file mode 100644 index 0000000..61c04b0 --- /dev/null +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/psci.c @@ -0,0 +1,130 @@ +/* + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as + * published by the Free Software Foundation. + * + * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, + * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of + * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the + * GNU General Public License for more details. + * + * Copyright (C) 2012 ARM Limited + * + * Author: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> + */ + +#include <linux/init.h> +#include <linux/smp.h> +#include <linux/of.h> +#include <linux/delay.h> +#include <linux/psci.h> + +#include <uapi/linux/psci.h> + +#include <asm/psci.h> +#include <asm/smp_plat.h> + +/* + * psci_smp assumes that the following is true about PSCI: + * + * cpu_suspend Suspend the execution on a CPU + * @state we don't currently describe affinity levels, so just pass 0. + * @entry_point the first instruction to be executed on return + * returns 0 success, < 0 on failure + * + * cpu_off Power down a CPU + * @state we don't currently describe affinity levels, so just pass 0. + * no return on successful call + * + * cpu_on Power up a CPU + * @cpuid cpuid of target CPU, as from MPIDR + * @entry_point the first instruction to be executed on return + * returns 0 success, < 0 on failure + * + * migrate Migrate the context to a different CPU + * @cpuid cpuid of target CPU, as from MPIDR + * returns 0 success, < 0 on failure + * + */ + +extern void secondary_startup(void); + +static int psci_boot_secondary(unsigned int cpu, struct task_struct *idle) +{ + if (psci_ops.cpu_on) + return psci_ops.cpu_on(cpu_logical_map(cpu), + virt_to_idmap(&secondary_startup)); + return -ENODEV; +} + +#ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU +int psci_cpu_disable(unsigned int cpu) +{ + /* Fail early if we don't have CPU_OFF support */ + if (!psci_ops.cpu_off) + return -EOPNOTSUPP; + + /* Trusted OS will deny CPU_OFF */ + if (psci_tos_resident_on(cpu)) + return -EPERM; + + return 0; +} + +void __ref psci_cpu_die(unsigned int cpu) +{ + u32 state = PSCI_POWER_STATE_TYPE_POWER_DOWN << + PSCI_0_2_POWER_STATE_TYPE_SHIFT; + + if (psci_ops.cpu_off) + psci_ops.cpu_off(state); + + /* We should never return */ + panic("psci: cpu %d failed to shutdown\n", cpu); +} + +int __ref psci_cpu_kill(unsigned int cpu) +{ + int err, i; + + if (!psci_ops.affinity_info) + return 1; + /* + * cpu_kill could race with cpu_die and we can + * potentially end up declaring this cpu undead + * while it is dying. So, try again a few times. + */ + + for (i = 0; i < 10; i++) { + err = psci_ops.affinity_info(cpu_logical_map(cpu), 0); + if (err == PSCI_0_2_AFFINITY_LEVEL_OFF) { + pr_info("CPU%d killed.\n", cpu); + return 1; + } + + msleep(10); + pr_info("Retrying again to check for CPU kill\n"); + } + + pr_warn("CPU%d may not have shut down cleanly (AFFINITY_INFO reports %d)\n", + cpu, err); + /* Make platform_cpu_kill() fail. */ + return 0; +} + +#endif + +bool __init psci_smp_available(void) +{ + /* is cpu_on available at least? */ + return (psci_ops.cpu_on != NULL); +} + +struct smp_operations __initdata psci_smp_ops = { + .smp_boot_secondary = psci_boot_secondary, +#ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU + .cpu_disable = psci_cpu_disable, + .cpu_die = psci_cpu_die, + .cpu_kill = psci_cpu_kill, +#endif +}; diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/psci_smp.c b/arch/arm/kernel/psci_smp.c deleted file mode 100644 index 61c04b0..0000000 --- a/arch/arm/kernel/psci_smp.c +++ /dev/null @@ -1,130 +0,0 @@ -/* - * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify - * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as - * published by the Free Software Foundation. - * - * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, - * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of - * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the - * GNU General Public License for more details. - * - * Copyright (C) 2012 ARM Limited - * - * Author: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> - */ - -#include <linux/init.h> -#include <linux/smp.h> -#include <linux/of.h> -#include <linux/delay.h> -#include <linux/psci.h> - -#include <uapi/linux/psci.h> - -#include <asm/psci.h> -#include <asm/smp_plat.h> - -/* - * psci_smp assumes that the following is true about PSCI: - * - * cpu_suspend Suspend the execution on a CPU - * @state we don't currently describe affinity levels, so just pass 0. - * @entry_point the first instruction to be executed on return - * returns 0 success, < 0 on failure - * - * cpu_off Power down a CPU - * @state we don't currently describe affinity levels, so just pass 0. - * no return on successful call - * - * cpu_on Power up a CPU - * @cpuid cpuid of target CPU, as from MPIDR - * @entry_point the first instruction to be executed on return - * returns 0 success, < 0 on failure - * - * migrate Migrate the context to a different CPU - * @cpuid cpuid of target CPU, as from MPIDR - * returns 0 success, < 0 on failure - * - */ - -extern void secondary_startup(void); - -static int psci_boot_secondary(unsigned int cpu, struct task_struct *idle) -{ - if (psci_ops.cpu_on) - return psci_ops.cpu_on(cpu_logical_map(cpu), - virt_to_idmap(&secondary_startup)); - return -ENODEV; -} - -#ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU -int psci_cpu_disable(unsigned int cpu) -{ - /* Fail early if we don't have CPU_OFF support */ - if (!psci_ops.cpu_off) - return -EOPNOTSUPP; - - /* Trusted OS will deny CPU_OFF */ - if (psci_tos_resident_on(cpu)) - return -EPERM; - - return 0; -} - -void __ref psci_cpu_die(unsigned int cpu) -{ - u32 state = PSCI_POWER_STATE_TYPE_POWER_DOWN << - PSCI_0_2_POWER_STATE_TYPE_SHIFT; - - if (psci_ops.cpu_off) - psci_ops.cpu_off(state); - - /* We should never return */ - panic("psci: cpu %d failed to shutdown\n", cpu); -} - -int __ref psci_cpu_kill(unsigned int cpu) -{ - int err, i; - - if (!psci_ops.affinity_info) - return 1; - /* - * cpu_kill could race with cpu_die and we can - * potentially end up declaring this cpu undead - * while it is dying. So, try again a few times. - */ - - for (i = 0; i < 10; i++) { - err = psci_ops.affinity_info(cpu_logical_map(cpu), 0); - if (err == PSCI_0_2_AFFINITY_LEVEL_OFF) { - pr_info("CPU%d killed.\n", cpu); - return 1; - } - - msleep(10); - pr_info("Retrying again to check for CPU kill\n"); - } - - pr_warn("CPU%d may not have shut down cleanly (AFFINITY_INFO reports %d)\n", - cpu, err); - /* Make platform_cpu_kill() fail. */ - return 0; -} - -#endif - -bool __init psci_smp_available(void) -{ - /* is cpu_on available@least? */ - return (psci_ops.cpu_on != NULL); -} - -struct smp_operations __initdata psci_smp_ops = { - .smp_boot_secondary = psci_boot_secondary, -#ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU - .cpu_disable = psci_cpu_disable, - .cpu_die = psci_cpu_die, - .cpu_kill = psci_cpu_kill, -#endif -}; -- 2.1.4 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [RFC PATCH 1/3] arm: psci: rename psci_smp.c to psci.c 2015-07-04 13:01 ` [RFC PATCH 1/3] arm: psci: rename psci_smp.c to psci.c Jisheng Zhang @ 2015-07-06 9:06 ` Daniel Lezcano 2015-07-06 9:14 ` Jisheng Zhang 0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread From: Daniel Lezcano @ 2015-07-06 9:06 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-arm-kernel On 07/04/2015 03:01 PM, Jisheng Zhang wrote: > This will prepare for next commit to enable PSCI for UP systems so that > calls like cpu_suspend can be made functional on UP too. > > Signed-off-by: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@marvell.com> > --- > arch/arm/kernel/Makefile | 2 +- > arch/arm/kernel/psci.c | 130 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > arch/arm/kernel/psci_smp.c | 130 --------------------------------------------- > 3 files changed, 131 insertions(+), 131 deletions(-) > create mode 100644 arch/arm/kernel/psci.c > delete mode 100644 arch/arm/kernel/psci_smp.c When you move or rename a file, use the -M option with git when sending the email. Instead of providing a big diff file, it will just annotate the renaming. -- <http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org ? Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook | <http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter | <http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [RFC PATCH 1/3] arm: psci: rename psci_smp.c to psci.c 2015-07-06 9:06 ` Daniel Lezcano @ 2015-07-06 9:14 ` Jisheng Zhang 0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread From: Jisheng Zhang @ 2015-07-06 9:14 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-arm-kernel On Mon, 6 Jul 2015 11:06:22 +0200 Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> wrote: > On 07/04/2015 03:01 PM, Jisheng Zhang wrote: > > This will prepare for next commit to enable PSCI for UP systems so that > > calls like cpu_suspend can be made functional on UP too. > > > > Signed-off-by: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@marvell.com> > > --- > > arch/arm/kernel/Makefile | 2 +- > > arch/arm/kernel/psci.c | 130 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > arch/arm/kernel/psci_smp.c | 130 --------------------------------------------- > > 3 files changed, 131 insertions(+), 131 deletions(-) > > create mode 100644 arch/arm/kernel/psci.c > > delete mode 100644 arch/arm/kernel/psci_smp.c > > When you move or rename a file, use the -M option with git when sending > the email. Instead of providing a big diff file, it will just annotate > the renaming. Thanks for the kindly remind and tips, I didn't know this before. Will take care that in the future. Thanks a lot, Jisheng ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [RFC PATCH 2/3] arm: psci: enable PSCI on UP systems 2015-07-04 13:01 [RFC PATCH 0/3] arm: psci: implement cpuidle_ops Jisheng Zhang 2015-07-04 13:01 ` [RFC PATCH 1/3] arm: psci: rename psci_smp.c to psci.c Jisheng Zhang @ 2015-07-04 13:01 ` Jisheng Zhang 2015-07-07 14:16 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi 2015-07-04 13:01 ` [RFC PATCH 3/3] arm: psci: add cpuidle_ops support Jisheng Zhang 2 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread From: Jisheng Zhang @ 2015-07-04 13:01 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-arm-kernel This is to make calls like eg cpu_suspend can be made functional on UP too. Signed-off-by: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@marvell.com> --- arch/arm/kernel/Makefile | 5 +---- arch/arm/kernel/psci.c | 2 ++ 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/Makefile b/arch/arm/kernel/Makefile index c57b2c0..2b1a60c 100644 --- a/arch/arm/kernel/Makefile +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/Makefile @@ -88,9 +88,6 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_DEBUG_LL) += debug.o obj-$(CONFIG_EARLY_PRINTK) += early_printk.o obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_VIRT_EXT) += hyp-stub.o -ifeq ($(CONFIG_ARM_PSCI),y) -obj-y += psci-call.o -obj-$(CONFIG_SMP) += psci.o -endif +obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_PSCI) += psci-call.o psci.o extra-y := $(head-y) vmlinux.lds diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/psci.c b/arch/arm/kernel/psci.c index 61c04b0..7f6ff02 100644 --- a/arch/arm/kernel/psci.c +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/psci.c @@ -47,6 +47,7 @@ * */ +#ifdef CONFIG_SMP extern void secondary_startup(void); static int psci_boot_secondary(unsigned int cpu, struct task_struct *idle) @@ -128,3 +129,4 @@ struct smp_operations __initdata psci_smp_ops = { .cpu_kill = psci_cpu_kill, #endif }; +#endif -- 2.1.4 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [RFC PATCH 2/3] arm: psci: enable PSCI on UP systems 2015-07-04 13:01 ` [RFC PATCH 2/3] arm: psci: enable PSCI on UP systems Jisheng Zhang @ 2015-07-07 14:16 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi 0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread From: Lorenzo Pieralisi @ 2015-07-07 14:16 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-arm-kernel On Sat, Jul 04, 2015 at 02:01:49PM +0100, Jisheng Zhang wrote: > This is to make calls like eg cpu_suspend can be made functional on UP too. > > Signed-off-by: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@marvell.com> > --- > arch/arm/kernel/Makefile | 5 +---- > arch/arm/kernel/psci.c | 2 ++ > 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) You will have to rewrite the commit log (mostly because PSCI CPU suspend will move to drivers/firmware so it will become stale, I know what you mean but it might be unclear to others so please improve it). Patch (and intent) seems fine though: Acked-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com> > diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/Makefile b/arch/arm/kernel/Makefile > index c57b2c0..2b1a60c 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/kernel/Makefile > +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/Makefile > @@ -88,9 +88,6 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_DEBUG_LL) += debug.o > obj-$(CONFIG_EARLY_PRINTK) += early_printk.o > > obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_VIRT_EXT) += hyp-stub.o > -ifeq ($(CONFIG_ARM_PSCI),y) > -obj-y += psci-call.o > -obj-$(CONFIG_SMP) += psci.o > -endif > +obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_PSCI) += psci-call.o psci.o > > extra-y := $(head-y) vmlinux.lds > diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/psci.c b/arch/arm/kernel/psci.c > index 61c04b0..7f6ff02 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/kernel/psci.c > +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/psci.c > @@ -47,6 +47,7 @@ > * > */ > > +#ifdef CONFIG_SMP > extern void secondary_startup(void); > > static int psci_boot_secondary(unsigned int cpu, struct task_struct *idle) > @@ -128,3 +129,4 @@ struct smp_operations __initdata psci_smp_ops = { > .cpu_kill = psci_cpu_kill, > #endif > }; > +#endif > -- > 2.1.4 > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [RFC PATCH 3/3] arm: psci: add cpuidle_ops support 2015-07-04 13:01 [RFC PATCH 0/3] arm: psci: implement cpuidle_ops Jisheng Zhang 2015-07-04 13:01 ` [RFC PATCH 1/3] arm: psci: rename psci_smp.c to psci.c Jisheng Zhang 2015-07-04 13:01 ` [RFC PATCH 2/3] arm: psci: enable PSCI on UP systems Jisheng Zhang @ 2015-07-04 13:01 ` Jisheng Zhang 2015-07-07 14:23 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi 2 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread From: Jisheng Zhang @ 2015-07-04 13:01 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-arm-kernel This patch implement cpuidle_ops using psci, the code is stolen from arm64. Now we can use cpuidle-arm.c for both arm and arm64. Signed-off-by: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@marvell.com> --- arch/arm/kernel/psci.c | 116 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 116 insertions(+) diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/psci.c b/arch/arm/kernel/psci.c index 7f6ff02..7bf744d 100644 --- a/arch/arm/kernel/psci.c +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/psci.c @@ -13,16 +13,132 @@ * Author: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> */ +#include <linux/cpuidle.h> #include <linux/init.h> #include <linux/smp.h> #include <linux/of.h> #include <linux/delay.h> #include <linux/psci.h> +#include <linux/slab.h> #include <uapi/linux/psci.h> +#include <asm/cpuidle.h> #include <asm/psci.h> #include <asm/smp_plat.h> +#include <asm/suspend.h> + +#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_IDLE +static bool psci_power_state_loses_context(u32 state) +{ + return state & PSCI_0_2_POWER_STATE_TYPE_MASK; +} + +static bool psci_power_state_is_valid(u32 state) +{ + const u32 valid_mask = PSCI_0_2_POWER_STATE_ID_MASK | + PSCI_0_2_POWER_STATE_TYPE_MASK | + PSCI_0_2_POWER_STATE_AFFL_MASK; + + return !(state & ~valid_mask); +} + +static DEFINE_PER_CPU_READ_MOSTLY(u32 *, psci_power_state); + +static int __init cpu_psci_cpu_init_idle(struct device_node *cpu_node, + int cpu) +{ + int i, ret, count = 0; + u32 *psci_states; + struct device_node *state_node; + + /* + * If the PSCI cpu_suspend function hook has not been initialized + * idle states must not be enabled, so bail out + */ + if (!psci_ops.cpu_suspend) + return -EOPNOTSUPP; + + /* Count idle states */ + while ((state_node = of_parse_phandle(cpu_node, "cpu-idle-states", + count))) { + count++; + of_node_put(state_node); + } + + if (!count) + return -ENODEV; + + psci_states = kcalloc(count, sizeof(*psci_states), GFP_KERNEL); + if (!psci_states) + return -ENOMEM; + + for (i = 0; i < count; i++) { + u32 state; + + state_node = of_parse_phandle(cpu_node, "cpu-idle-states", i); + + ret = of_property_read_u32(state_node, + "arm,psci-suspend-param", + &state); + if (ret) { + pr_warn(" * %s missing arm,psci-suspend-param property\n", + state_node->full_name); + of_node_put(state_node); + goto free_mem; + } + + of_node_put(state_node); + pr_warn("psci-power-state %#x index %d\n", state, i); + if (!psci_power_state_is_valid(state)) { + pr_warn("Invalid PSCI power state %#x\n", state); + ret = -EINVAL; + goto free_mem; + } + psci_states[i] = state; + } + /* Idle states parsed correctly, initialize per-cpu pointer */ + per_cpu(psci_power_state, cpu) = psci_states; + return 0; + +free_mem: + kfree(psci_states); + return ret; +} + +static int psci_suspend_finisher(unsigned long index) +{ + u32 *state = __this_cpu_read(psci_power_state); + + return psci_ops.cpu_suspend(state[index - 1], + virt_to_phys(cpu_resume)); +} + +static int cpu_psci_cpu_suspend(int cpu, unsigned long index) +{ + int ret; + u32 *state = __this_cpu_read(psci_power_state); + /* + * idle state index 0 corresponds to wfi, should never be called + * from the cpu_suspend operations + */ + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!index)) + return -EINVAL; + + if (!psci_power_state_loses_context(state[index - 1])) + ret = psci_ops.cpu_suspend(state[index - 1], 0); + else + ret = cpu_suspend(index, psci_suspend_finisher); + + return ret; +} + +static struct cpuidle_ops psci_cpuidle_ops __initdata = { + .suspend = cpu_psci_cpu_suspend, + .init = cpu_psci_cpu_init_idle, +}; +CPUIDLE_METHOD_OF_DECLARE(psci_idle, "psci", &psci_cpuidle_ops); +#endif /* * psci_smp assumes that the following is true about PSCI: -- 2.1.4 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [RFC PATCH 3/3] arm: psci: add cpuidle_ops support 2015-07-04 13:01 ` [RFC PATCH 3/3] arm: psci: add cpuidle_ops support Jisheng Zhang @ 2015-07-07 14:23 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi 2015-07-08 6:46 ` Jisheng Zhang 0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread From: Lorenzo Pieralisi @ 2015-07-07 14:23 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-arm-kernel On Sat, Jul 04, 2015 at 02:01:50PM +0100, Jisheng Zhang wrote: > This patch implement cpuidle_ops using psci, the code is stolen from > arm64. Now we can use cpuidle-arm.c for both arm and arm64. You mean cpuidle-arm.c with PSCI back-end. You will have to rewrite the commit log anyway since this patch will be significantly trimmed, see below. > Signed-off-by: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@marvell.com> > --- > arch/arm/kernel/psci.c | 116 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 116 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/psci.c b/arch/arm/kernel/psci.c > index 7f6ff02..7bf744d 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/kernel/psci.c > +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/psci.c > @@ -13,16 +13,132 @@ > * Author: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> > */ > > +#include <linux/cpuidle.h> > #include <linux/init.h> > #include <linux/smp.h> > #include <linux/of.h> > #include <linux/delay.h> > #include <linux/psci.h> > +#include <linux/slab.h> > > #include <uapi/linux/psci.h> > > +#include <asm/cpuidle.h> > #include <asm/psci.h> > #include <asm/smp_plat.h> > +#include <asm/suspend.h> > + > +#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_IDLE > +static bool psci_power_state_loses_context(u32 state) > +{ > + return state & PSCI_0_2_POWER_STATE_TYPE_MASK; > +} > + > +static bool psci_power_state_is_valid(u32 state) > +{ > + const u32 valid_mask = PSCI_0_2_POWER_STATE_ID_MASK | > + PSCI_0_2_POWER_STATE_TYPE_MASK | > + PSCI_0_2_POWER_STATE_AFFL_MASK; > + > + return !(state & ~valid_mask); > +} Already moved these helpers to drivers/firmware: http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2015-May/347355.html > + > +static DEFINE_PER_CPU_READ_MOSTLY(u32 *, psci_power_state); > + > +static int __init cpu_psci_cpu_init_idle(struct device_node *cpu_node, > + int cpu) > +{ > + int i, ret, count = 0; > + u32 *psci_states; > + struct device_node *state_node; > + > + /* > + * If the PSCI cpu_suspend function hook has not been initialized > + * idle states must not be enabled, so bail out > + */ > + if (!psci_ops.cpu_suspend) > + return -EOPNOTSUPP; > + > + /* Count idle states */ > + while ((state_node = of_parse_phandle(cpu_node, "cpu-idle-states", > + count))) { > + count++; > + of_node_put(state_node); > + } > + > + if (!count) > + return -ENODEV; > + > + psci_states = kcalloc(count, sizeof(*psci_states), GFP_KERNEL); > + if (!psci_states) > + return -ENOMEM; > + > + for (i = 0; i < count; i++) { > + u32 state; > + > + state_node = of_parse_phandle(cpu_node, "cpu-idle-states", i); > + > + ret = of_property_read_u32(state_node, > + "arm,psci-suspend-param", > + &state); > + if (ret) { > + pr_warn(" * %s missing arm,psci-suspend-param property\n", > + state_node->full_name); > + of_node_put(state_node); > + goto free_mem; > + } > + > + of_node_put(state_node); > + pr_warn("psci-power-state %#x index %d\n", state, i); > + if (!psci_power_state_is_valid(state)) { > + pr_warn("Invalid PSCI power state %#x\n", state); > + ret = -EINVAL; > + goto free_mem; > + } > + psci_states[i] = state; > + } > + /* Idle states parsed correctly, initialize per-cpu pointer */ > + per_cpu(psci_power_state, cpu) = psci_states; > + return 0; > + > +free_mem: > + kfree(psci_states); > + return ret; > +} > + > +static int psci_suspend_finisher(unsigned long index) > +{ > + u32 *state = __this_cpu_read(psci_power_state); > + > + return psci_ops.cpu_suspend(state[index - 1], > + virt_to_phys(cpu_resume)); > +} > + > +static int cpu_psci_cpu_suspend(int cpu, unsigned long index) > +{ > + int ret; > + u32 *state = __this_cpu_read(psci_power_state); > + /* > + * idle state index 0 corresponds to wfi, should never be called > + * from the cpu_suspend operations > + */ > + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!index)) > + return -EINVAL; > + > + if (!psci_power_state_loses_context(state[index - 1])) > + ret = psci_ops.cpu_suspend(state[index - 1], 0); > + else > + ret = cpu_suspend(index, psci_suspend_finisher); > + > + return ret; > +} Code above is arch agnostic and should be moved out of arch/arm (and arm64). Can you put together a patch to do it or you want me to do it ? > +static struct cpuidle_ops psci_cpuidle_ops __initdata = { > + .suspend = cpu_psci_cpu_suspend, > + .init = cpu_psci_cpu_init_idle, > +}; > +CPUIDLE_METHOD_OF_DECLARE(psci_idle, "psci", &psci_cpuidle_ops); > +#endif This is fine and should stay in arch/arm. Thanks, Lorenzo ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [RFC PATCH 3/3] arm: psci: add cpuidle_ops support 2015-07-07 14:23 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi @ 2015-07-08 6:46 ` Jisheng Zhang 0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread From: Jisheng Zhang @ 2015-07-08 6:46 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-arm-kernel Dear Lorenzo, On Tue, 7 Jul 2015 15:23:45 +0100 Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com> wrote: > On Sat, Jul 04, 2015 at 02:01:50PM +0100, Jisheng Zhang wrote: > > This patch implement cpuidle_ops using psci, the code is stolen from > > arm64. Now we can use cpuidle-arm.c for both arm and arm64. > > You mean cpuidle-arm.c with PSCI back-end. You will have to rewrite > the commit log anyway since this patch will be significantly trimmed, > see below. Will do, thanks for the suggestion. > > > Signed-off-by: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@marvell.com> > > --- > > arch/arm/kernel/psci.c | 116 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > 1 file changed, 116 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/psci.c b/arch/arm/kernel/psci.c > > index 7f6ff02..7bf744d 100644 > > --- a/arch/arm/kernel/psci.c > > +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/psci.c > > @@ -13,16 +13,132 @@ > > * Author: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> > > */ > > > > +#include <linux/cpuidle.h> > > #include <linux/init.h> > > #include <linux/smp.h> > > #include <linux/of.h> > > #include <linux/delay.h> > > #include <linux/psci.h> > > +#include <linux/slab.h> > > > > #include <uapi/linux/psci.h> > > > > +#include <asm/cpuidle.h> > > #include <asm/psci.h> > > #include <asm/smp_plat.h> > > +#include <asm/suspend.h> > > + > > +#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_IDLE > > +static bool psci_power_state_loses_context(u32 state) > > +{ > > + return state & PSCI_0_2_POWER_STATE_TYPE_MASK; > > +} > > + > > +static bool psci_power_state_is_valid(u32 state) > > +{ > > + const u32 valid_mask = PSCI_0_2_POWER_STATE_ID_MASK | > > + PSCI_0_2_POWER_STATE_TYPE_MASK | > > + PSCI_0_2_POWER_STATE_AFFL_MASK; > > + > > + return !(state & ~valid_mask); > > +} > > Already moved these helpers to drivers/firmware: > > http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2015-May/347355.html > > > + > > +static DEFINE_PER_CPU_READ_MOSTLY(u32 *, psci_power_state); > > + > > +static int __init cpu_psci_cpu_init_idle(struct device_node *cpu_node, > > + int cpu) > > +{ > > + int i, ret, count = 0; > > + u32 *psci_states; > > + struct device_node *state_node; > > + > > + /* > > + * If the PSCI cpu_suspend function hook has not been initialized > > + * idle states must not be enabled, so bail out > > + */ > > + if (!psci_ops.cpu_suspend) > > + return -EOPNOTSUPP; > > + > > + /* Count idle states */ > > + while ((state_node = of_parse_phandle(cpu_node, "cpu-idle-states", > > + count))) { > > + count++; > > + of_node_put(state_node); > > + } > > + > > + if (!count) > > + return -ENODEV; > > + > > + psci_states = kcalloc(count, sizeof(*psci_states), GFP_KERNEL); > > + if (!psci_states) > > + return -ENOMEM; > > + > > + for (i = 0; i < count; i++) { > > + u32 state; > > + > > + state_node = of_parse_phandle(cpu_node, "cpu-idle-states", i); > > + > > + ret = of_property_read_u32(state_node, > > + "arm,psci-suspend-param", > > + &state); > > + if (ret) { > > + pr_warn(" * %s missing arm,psci-suspend-param property\n", > > + state_node->full_name); > > + of_node_put(state_node); > > + goto free_mem; > > + } > > + > > + of_node_put(state_node); > > + pr_warn("psci-power-state %#x index %d\n", state, i); > > + if (!psci_power_state_is_valid(state)) { > > + pr_warn("Invalid PSCI power state %#x\n", state); > > + ret = -EINVAL; > > + goto free_mem; > > + } > > + psci_states[i] = state; > > + } > > + /* Idle states parsed correctly, initialize per-cpu pointer */ > > + per_cpu(psci_power_state, cpu) = psci_states; > > + return 0; > > + > > +free_mem: > > + kfree(psci_states); > > + return ret; > > +} > > + > > +static int psci_suspend_finisher(unsigned long index) > > +{ > > + u32 *state = __this_cpu_read(psci_power_state); > > + > > + return psci_ops.cpu_suspend(state[index - 1], > > + virt_to_phys(cpu_resume)); > > +} > > + > > +static int cpu_psci_cpu_suspend(int cpu, unsigned long index) > > +{ > > + int ret; > > + u32 *state = __this_cpu_read(psci_power_state); > > + /* > > + * idle state index 0 corresponds to wfi, should never be called > > + * from the cpu_suspend operations > > + */ > > + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!index)) > > + return -EINVAL; > > + > > + if (!psci_power_state_loses_context(state[index - 1])) > > + ret = psci_ops.cpu_suspend(state[index - 1], 0); > > + else > > + ret = cpu_suspend(index, psci_suspend_finisher); > > + > > + return ret; > > +} > > Code above is arch agnostic and should be moved out of arch/arm (and > arm64). Got it. the remaining issue is cpuidle_ops.suspend prototype. Does it make sense to change it from int (*suspend)(int cpu, unsigned long arg); to int (*suspend)(unsigned long arg); It seems that the to-be-suspended cpu is always the calling cpu itself. Anyway I won't change the prototype but make a simple glue instead in the next for patch for review. > > Can you put together a patch to do it or you want me to do it ? > > > +static struct cpuidle_ops psci_cpuidle_ops __initdata = { > > + .suspend = cpu_psci_cpu_suspend, > > + .init = cpu_psci_cpu_init_idle, > > +}; > > +CPUIDLE_METHOD_OF_DECLARE(psci_idle, "psci", &psci_cpuidle_ops); > > +#endif > > This is fine and should stay in arch/arm. Thanks a lot for the review and tips, I'll cook newer patches for review. Thanks, Jisheng ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2015-07-08 6:46 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 9+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2015-07-04 13:01 [RFC PATCH 0/3] arm: psci: implement cpuidle_ops Jisheng Zhang 2015-07-04 13:01 ` [RFC PATCH 1/3] arm: psci: rename psci_smp.c to psci.c Jisheng Zhang 2015-07-06 9:06 ` Daniel Lezcano 2015-07-06 9:14 ` Jisheng Zhang 2015-07-04 13:01 ` [RFC PATCH 2/3] arm: psci: enable PSCI on UP systems Jisheng Zhang 2015-07-07 14:16 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi 2015-07-04 13:01 ` [RFC PATCH 3/3] arm: psci: add cpuidle_ops support Jisheng Zhang 2015-07-07 14:23 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi 2015-07-08 6:46 ` Jisheng Zhang
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).