From: jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com (Jason Gunthorpe)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v4 3/5] tee: generic TEE subsystem
Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2015 16:26:49 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150708222649.GA20068@obsidianresearch.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150708211129.GA29824@kroah.com>
On Wed, Jul 08, 2015 at 02:11:29PM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > + cdev_init(&teedev->cdev, &tee_fops);
> > > + teedev->cdev.owner = teedesc->owner;
> >
> > This also needs to set teedev->cdev.kobj.parent.
> > I'm guessing:
> >
> > teedev->cdev.kobj.parent = &teedev->dev.kobj;
> >
> > TPM had the same mistake..
>
> Really? As of a few years ago, A cdev's kobject should not be touched
> by anything other than the cdev core. It's not a "real" kobject in that
> it is never registered in sysfs, and no one sees it. I keep meaning to
Well, when I looked at it, it looked like it was necessary to maintain
the refcount on the memory that is holding cdev.
The basic issue is that cdev_del doesn't seem to be synchronizing.
The use after free race is then something like:
struct tpm_chip {
struct device dev;
struct cdev cdev;
CPU0 CPU1
================= ======================
tpm_chip = kalloc
cdev_add(&tpm_chip->cdev)
device_add(&tpm_chip->dev)
chrdev_open
filp->f_op->open
cdev_del(&tpm_chip->cdev)
device_unregister
(&tpm_chip->dev)
kfree(tpm_chip)
tpm_chip = container_of
fput
cdev_put(.. cdev)
Ie we need cdev to hold a ref on tpm_chip->dev until cdev_put is
called.
> just use something else one of these days for that structure, as lots of
> people get it wrong. Or has things changed there?
Not recently, but this is the commit:
commit 2f0157f13f42800aa3d9017ebb0fb80a65f7b2de
Author: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Date: Sun Oct 21 17:57:19 2012 -0700
char_dev: pin parent kobject
In certain cases (for example when a cdev structure is embedded into
another object whose lifetime is controlled by a separate kobject) it is
beneficial to tie lifetime of another object to the lifetime of
character device so that related object is not freed until after
char_dev object is freed.
To achieve this let's pin kobject's parent when doing cdev_add() and
unpin when last reference to cdev structure is being released.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
It doesn't seem the be the best situation, this is the 3rd time this
week I've noticed cdev with a kalloc'd struct being used improperly.
Perhaps cdev_init should accept the module and kref parent as an
argument?
Jason
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-07-08 22:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-07-08 10:16 [PATCH v4 0/5] generic TEE subsystem Jens Wiklander
2015-07-08 10:16 ` [PATCH v4 1/5] arm/arm64: add smccc ARCH32 Jens Wiklander
2015-07-08 10:16 ` [PATCH v4 2/5] dt/bindings: add bindings for optee Jens Wiklander
2015-07-08 10:16 ` [PATCH v4 3/5] tee: generic TEE subsystem Jens Wiklander
2015-07-08 17:10 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2015-07-08 21:11 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2015-07-08 22:26 ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
2015-07-08 22:33 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2015-07-08 23:16 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2015-07-08 23:53 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2015-07-09 0:47 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2015-07-08 23:28 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2015-07-08 23:52 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2015-07-09 0:56 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2015-07-09 12:49 ` Jens Wiklander
2015-07-09 18:25 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2015-07-08 10:16 ` [PATCH v4 4/5] tee: add OP-TEE driver Jens Wiklander
2015-07-08 10:16 ` [PATCH v4 5/5] Documentation: tee subsystem and op-tee driver Jens Wiklander
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150708222649.GA20068@obsidianresearch.com \
--to=jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).