linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com (Boris Brezillon)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 0/9] regulator: pwm-regulator: Introduce continuous-mode
Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2015 08:30:41 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150709083041.3b203eb1@bbrezillon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1436281613-899-1-git-send-email-lee.jones@linaro.org>

Hi Lee,

I'm interested in this feature (so as Doug is), could you add us in Cc
of your next submission ?

On Tue,  7 Jul 2015 16:06:44 +0100
Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> wrote:

> This patch-set has been rebased on to topic/pwm.
>   
> Continuous mode uses the PWM regulator's maximum and minimum supplied
> voltages specified in the regulator-{min,max}-microvolt properties to
> calculate appropriate duty-cycle values.  This allows for a much more
> fine grained solution when compared with voltage-table mode, which
> this driver already supports.  This solution does make an assumption
> that a %50 duty-cycle value will cause the regulator voltage to run
> at half way between the supplied max_uV and min_uV values.

Well, I'm not sure this assumption works for all pwm driven regulators.
What if your regulator does not react linearly to the PWM duty-cycle
config ?

How about addressing that by using all the entries of the
voltage<->duty table association and doing the linear interpolation
between the provided points instead of doing it on the min -> max
range ?

Best Regards,

Boris

> 
> Lee Jones (9):
>   ARM: multi_v7_defconfig: Enable ST's PWM driver
>   ARM: multi_v7_defconfig: Enable ST's Power Reset driver
>   ARM: multi_v7_defconfig: Enable support for PWM Regulators
>   ARM: STi: STiH407: Move PWM nodes STiH407 => STiH407-family
>   ARM: STi: STiH407: Add PWM Regulator node
>   regulator: pwm-regulator: Re-write bindings
>   regulator: pwm-regulator: Add support for continuous-voltage
>   regulator: pwm-regulator: Simplify voltage to duty-cycle call
>   regulator: pwm-regulator: Don't assign structure attributes right away
> 
>  .../bindings/regulator/pwm-regulator.txt           |  68 ++++++++++---
>  arch/arm/boot/dts/stih407-family.dtsi              |  41 ++++++++
>  arch/arm/boot/dts/stih407.dtsi                     |  28 ------
>  arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig                |   3 +
>  drivers/regulator/pwm-regulator.c                  | 109 ++++++++++++++++++---
>  5 files changed, 198 insertions(+), 51 deletions(-)
> 



-- 
Boris Brezillon, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com

  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-07-09  6:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-07-07 15:06 [PATCH v2 0/9] regulator: pwm-regulator: Introduce continuous-mode Lee Jones
2015-07-07 15:06 ` [PATCH v2 1/9] ARM: multi_v7_defconfig: Enable ST's PWM driver Lee Jones
2015-07-07 15:06 ` [PATCH v2 2/9] ARM: multi_v7_defconfig: Enable ST's Power Reset driver Lee Jones
2015-07-07 15:06 ` [PATCH v2 3/9] ARM: multi_v7_defconfig: Enable support for PWM Regulators Lee Jones
2015-07-07 15:06 ` [PATCH v2 4/9] ARM: STi: STiH407: Move PWM nodes STiH407 => STiH407-family Lee Jones
2015-07-07 15:06 ` [PATCH v2 5/9] ARM: STi: STiH407: Add PWM Regulator node Lee Jones
2015-07-07 15:06 ` [PATCH v2 6/9] regulator: pwm-regulator: Re-write bindings Lee Jones
2015-07-09  8:01   ` Boris Brezillon
2015-07-07 15:06 ` [PATCH v2 7/9] regulator: pwm-regulator: Add support for continuous-voltage Lee Jones
2015-07-07 15:06 ` [PATCH v2 8/9] regulator: pwm-regulator: Simplify voltage to duty-cycle call Lee Jones
2015-07-07 15:06 ` [PATCH v2 9/9] regulator: pwm-regulator: Don't assign structure attributes right away Lee Jones
2015-07-09  6:30 ` Boris Brezillon [this message]
2015-07-09 11:51   ` [PATCH v2 0/9] regulator: pwm-regulator: Introduce continuous-mode Lee Jones
2015-07-09 13:14     ` Boris Brezillon
2015-07-09 15:44       ` Lee Jones
2015-07-09 16:25       ` Doug Anderson
2015-07-09 17:20         ` Lee Jones

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150709083041.3b203eb1@bbrezillon \
    --to=boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).